Member Login
member
passwd
remember me on this computer.

- join now -

Search

Neat Stuff

Visit our shop for nerds in control lifestyle products.

Cool stuff
Select a topic of interest:
...and press:
Fortune
"If you want to know what happens to you when you die, go look at some dead
stuff."
-- Dave Enyeart
RSS Feed
RSS feed Use this link to get an RSS feed of the Control.com article flow, for private, non-commercial use only:
www.control.com/rss
Select a Page Style
Select one of the following styles:
- BluFu
- Classic
(cookies required)
from the Automation List department...
Capacitance Leveler
Sensors topic
advertisement
Posted by Doug Millner on 14 August, 2007 - 12:56 am
I am kind of new to all this and don't have any in-plant experience. We are putting a transmitter in a cooling tower basin to measure the depth. The basin is going to be very dirty. Toilet bowl dirty. I talked with a vendor about using a capacitance level rod and he said that the only issue was how often it was cleaned and that if too much stuff was sticking to it, it would let you know. How often do these need to be cleaned if they are used in an application that is toilet bowl dirty. Would going to a bubbler be a better option?

Posted by Walt Boyes on 14 August, 2007 - 5:52 pm
There are dozens of ways to measure the level in a cooling tower basin. The continuum is from cheap to maintenance free.

The cheaper stuff is generally more maintenance intensive.

Maintenance free (within reason) would be direct pressure transducers and ultrasonic level gauges. You could use radar, but you don't have to. The price of ultrasonic transmitters has come down incredibly, in recent years, and they have no moving parts and don't contact the fluid. They can be damped, also, to deal with wave action in the basin, too. If you have foam, you'll have problems, though.

Of course, this begs the question of why you have "toilet bowl" dirty cooling water sumps. You shouldn't. You might also investigate what is causing this problem and fix it, while you're at it.

Walt Boyes
Editor in Chief
Control magazine
www.controlglobal.com
blog:Sound OFF!! http://www.controlglobal.com/soundoff
_________________

Putman Media Inc.
555 W. Pierce Rd. Suite 301
Itasca, IL 60143
630-467-1301 x368
wboyes@putman.net

Posted by William Hinton on 15 August, 2007 - 11:49 pm
Doug,

I had problems about 20 years ago with some of the same reliability and maintenance issues so I simply installed a float valve with a mechanical float. The results have been 20 years of problem free operation. By the way, it was cheaper than any electrical solution we had tried and we needed a valve any way.

I hope this helps,

William Hinton

Posted by Anonymous on 17 August, 2007 - 10:14 am
Municipalities routinely use float switches in sewage lift stations. The float is some sort of elastomer (rubbery material) has an internal switch that connects to a controller through the cable. It works well.

But then there are floats that run move up and down vertically on a rod. Bad idea for crummy media - the rod will crud up and the float will stick.

Floats are fine for fixed switch points.

For continous level measurement, either ultraonics or radar do not contact the sump contects, but do cost more, as does any continuous measurement.

Posted by Juan Pinzon on 19 August, 2007 - 8:25 pm
Dear Doug,
we have a bubbler level control working very well in our cooling tower basin, I had have a lot of bad experiencie with capacitance level measuring in closed tank, but I think that in open basin will work good, maybe the frecuent maintenance will be the little problem.

Regards
J.Pinzon
Instruments Techniccian

Posted by Drex on 24 August, 2007 - 12:23 am
What's the height? And is there any obstruction cutting the ultrasonic cone?

If no, then seems like perfect place for Ultrasonic.

It's not that expensive either!

Drex

Posted by suresh on 9 May, 2008 - 10:32 pm
Yes, the bubbler type LT can work better. We are using in STP tank level and in some other corrosive liquid measurement. They are working very fine.

From Control Engineering magazine...
Related articles from Control Engineering magazine
Above articles copyright 2008 Reed Business Information. Subject to its Terms of Use.

Your use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions set forth under Legal Notices and the Privacy Policy. Please read those terms and conditions carefully. Subject to the rights expressly reserved to others under Legal Notices, the content of this site and the compilation thereof is © 1999-2008 Control Technology Corporation. All rights reserved.

Users of this site are benefiting from open source technologies, including PHP, PostgreSQL and Apache. Be happy.

Advertisement
Our Advertisers
Help keep our servers running...
Patronize our advertisers!