Member Login
Search
Jump to a Date
Sponsored Communities
Cool stuff
Neat Stuff

Visit our shop for nerds in control lifestyle products.
Thermal Overload
The threads that wouldn't die...
- PC reliability?
- Windows, real time
- PID loops
- PCs vs. PLCs
- Replacing people
- MS 'monopoly'?
- Software quality
- Where do we go from here?
- Why pay?
- PC reliability?
- Windows, real time
- PID loops
- PCs vs. PLCs
- Replacing people
- MS 'monopoly'?
- Software quality
- Where do we go from here?
- Why pay?
Fortune
"You can't teach people to be lazy - either they have it, or they
don't."
-- Dagwood Bumstead
don't."
-- Dagwood Bumstead
RSS Feed
www.control.com/rss/
To get a personalized feed, become a member at no cost.
What I don't understand about induction generators (among other things) is: is the speed of the generator going to be limited by the grid frequency that excites the armature, or will it turn close to its optimal speed?
I have an nano-turbine that operates on 3.3 lbs/hr of steam. It's ideal rotational velocity for peak efficiency is about 80,000 rpm (fyi: it uses magnetic bearings). I want to put an induction generator on it to produce grid connect AC. What I don't understand about induction generators (among other things) is: is the speed of the generator going to be limited by the grid frequency that excites the armature, or will it turn close to its optimal speed?
I have an nano-turbine that operates on 3.3 lbs/hr of steam. It's ideal rotational velocity for peak efficiency is about 80,000 rpm (fyi: it uses magnetic bearings). I want to put an induction generator on it to produce grid connect AC. What I don't understand about induction generators (among other things) is: is the speed of the generator going to be limited by the grid frequency that excites the armature, or will it turn close to its optimal speed?
Xerus, I don't believe you can use your nano-turbine to drive an induction generator or motor at the speed stated. But, a homopolar-generator might work.
Try contacting The University of Texas, Balcones Center for Electromagnetic Research, in Austin, Tx. In the '80s they had 15-20 k-rpm machines. And, I recently heard about 50-60 k-rpm units.
However, be aware that there are several drawbacks. Such machines generate only dc, meaning: they have slip-rings and brushes; they operate for short-duration; and they're massive!
But, you can never tell where a contact will lead... they might be able to point you in the right direction!
Good luck! Phil Corso (cepsicon@aol.com)
Try contacting The University of Texas, Balcones Center for Electromagnetic Research, in Austin, Tx. In the '80s they had 15-20 k-rpm machines. And, I recently heard about 50-60 k-rpm units.
However, be aware that there are several drawbacks. Such machines generate only dc, meaning: they have slip-rings and brushes; they operate for short-duration; and they're massive!
But, you can never tell where a contact will lead... they might be able to point you in the right direction!
Good luck! Phil Corso (cepsicon@aol.com)
Thanks for the lead. Also, why is it that you don't think an induction generator will work?
With a homopolar-generator, keeping the brushes in contact with the slip rings and avoiding excessive friction would require some very careful engineering. Of course, doing *anything* at these speeds requires careful engineering. The output is also low voltage and high current, which might not match too well to a standard inverter.
A permanent magnet generator might be a better solution, if a suitable design can be found. The output (which would be higher voltage than a homopolar generator) could be rectified and then put through an inverter. If it is possible to have a coreless design for the stator (I haven't seen one though) this might address the problem with iron losses at high frequency.
The above is speculation, and I can't recommend any particular sources of information.
A permanent magnet generator might be a better solution, if a suitable design can be found. The output (which would be higher voltage than a homopolar generator) could be rectified and then put through an inverter. If it is possible to have a coreless design for the stator (I haven't seen one though) this might address the problem with iron losses at high frequency.
The above is speculation, and I can't recommend any particular sources of information.
From Control Engineering magazine...
Related articles from Control
Engineering magazine- Here's what you need to know about controls, says Automation Federation, U.S. government
- Electrical product safety: Are testing labs needed or is a supplier's declaration enough?
- Automation vendors boost biofuels
- Cyber security issues take center stage in 2009
- AIC Series presents new high energy storage chokes
- Decrease arc flash risk with new motor control center option
- Relays: Slim industrial relays have push-in terminal sockets
- 2009 Automation Integrator Guide
- Relays: Industrial relays for OEMs, process industries available in kits
Above articles copyright 2009 Reed Business Information.
Subject to its Terms of Use.
Your use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions set forth under Legal Notices and the Privacy Policy. Please read those terms and conditions carefully. Subject to the rights expressly reserved to others under Legal Notices, the content of this site and the compilation thereof is © 1999-2009 Control Technology Corporation. All rights reserved.
Our Advertisers
Help keep our servers running...
Patronize our advertisers!
Patronize our advertisers!




