Member Login
member
passwd
remember me on
this computer.

- join now -
- forgot username or password? -

Search

Jump to a Date

Sponsored Communities
Cool stuff
Select a topic of interest:
...and press:
Neat Stuff
Control.com Stuff

Visit our shop for nerds in control lifestyle products.

Fortune
There are two types of people in this world, good and bad. The good
sleep better, but the bad seem to enjoy the waking hours much more.
-- Woody Allen
RSS Feed
RSS feed Use this link to get an RSS feed of the Control.com article flow, for private, non-commercial use only:
www.control.com/rss/
To get a personalized feed, become a member at no cost.
Select a Page Style
Select one of the following styles:
- BluFu
- Classic
(cookies required)
advertisement
from the IA department...
Networks Advice
Local and wide area networking in factory automation. topic
Posted by PaleFace on 23 September, 2007 - 7:23 pm
would it cause any delay or troubles in communication if we mixed network ranges in the same stiches?

like we have 172.16.X.X along with 192.168.X.X adresses in the same auto negotiating unmanaged switch!


Posted by Nathan Boeger on 25 September, 2007 - 12:31 am
It really shouldn't. You should be fine. Even a cheap modern switch has a huge capacity. However, broadcast requests will be sent and heard from both.

Really screwy packets being formed, broadcast storms, attacks, etc are possible between networks. For example, I've seen a windows computer that had 2 IP addresses bound to the same adapter magically lock up a clunky embedded NIC on an NMR machine. If you're really security conscious you might separate your networks between switches or VLANS.

----
Nathan Boeger
http://www.inductiveautomation.com
Total SCADA freedom


Posted by Steven Hollingsworth on 25 September, 2007 - 8:45 pm
It shouldn't cause any problems if the switch is unmanaged. The machines use ARP [0] to find the other hosts' IP addresse on the same network. With a
managed switch you can make VLANs and in some cases access control lists to enhance security. Your setup isn't ideal, but you shouldn't have any problems.

HTH,

~ sh


Posted by Anand Edke on 28 September, 2007 - 11:22 pm
Why would you not want to use a router for this purpose? After all, thats what they are designed for!

A good design aspect would be to segregate your domains via a router and then plug the respective ranges into seperate switches. Check out HARTING for a comprehensive range of Ethernet switches.


Posted by Nathan Boeger on 20 October, 2007 - 9:07 pm
You would use a Layer 3 switch as opposed to a router. They're really very similar except that the router does it in software and the switch does it with hardware (ASICs). The advantage of a "smart" switch is that you can logically define "networks" (VLANS) that can't communicate with each other directly. These can be based on physical ports or MAC addresses. You can assign logical gateways in the switch that act as routers like you're referring.

A router is going to be better suited for connecting large networks (huge cached routing table) and providing security (if it has a firewall or policies built in).

A managed switch will be better for creating "separate" networks for you to use.

Again, the "gotcha" from a security geek or hypothetical situation is separating broadcast domains.

Hope this helps,

----
Nathan Boeger, MCSE
http://demo.inductiveautomation.com
Total SCADA Freedom


Posted by Deepak on 19 October, 2007 - 1:13 am
Using different networks through a single switch is not a problem, but it's not advisable, two broadcast domains would fall into the same switch. It has to be separated through VLAN based switches or to have a router to do so.


Posted by Tomy Zacharia on 21 October, 2007 - 4:52 pm
You might run into trouble with netbeui if any of your computers use it.

Tomy Zacharia

From Control Engineering magazine...
Related articles from Control Engineering magazine
Above articles copyright 2009 Reed Business Information. Subject to its Terms of Use.
Your use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions set forth under Legal Notices and the Privacy Policy. Please read those terms and conditions carefully. Subject to the rights expressly reserved to others under Legal Notices, the content of this site and the compilation thereof is © 1999-2009 Control Technology Corporation. All rights reserved.

Users of this site are benefiting from open source technologies, including PHP, MySQL and Apache. Be happy.

Internet Explorer 6.0 Fix

Advertisement
Our Advertisers
Help keep our servers running...
Patronize our advertisers!