Member Login
Search
Jump to a Date
Sponsored Communities
Cool stuff
Neat Stuff

Visit our shop for nerds in control lifestyle products.
Thermal Overload
The threads that wouldn't die...
- PC reliability?
- Windows, real time
- PID loops
- PCs vs. PLCs
- Replacing people
- MS 'monopoly'?
- Software quality
- Where do we go from here?
- Why pay?
- PC reliability?
- Windows, real time
- PID loops
- PCs vs. PLCs
- Replacing people
- MS 'monopoly'?
- Software quality
- Where do we go from here?
- Why pay?
Fortune
Remember: Silly is a state of Mind, Stupid is a way of Life.
-- Dave Butler
-- Dave Butler
RSS Feed
www.control.com/rss/
To get a personalized feed, become a member at no cost.
Hi everybody,
We are considering the use of Yokogawa CS3000 DCS as the main PCS. We have a number of vendor packages as well. To avoid having different hardware (and consequently different hardware, different software, different tools, different spare parts, different expertise, etc.) one idea is that all the controllers be the same.
Is it possible that each vendor purchases an FCS by Yokogawa instead of using other common PLCs by Siemens, Allen Bradley, ABB, etc?
I guess there are some challenges in this:
1- Everybody should be master in programming Yokogawa FCS which I doubt it is the case.
2- FCS must be a standalone controller so that everybody can test his own package at his own site.
3- Even if everybody uses the same FCS and software, there will be different programing techniques which makes the documentation and future troubleshooting very difficult.
4- FCS by Yokogawa seems to be more expensive than convenient PLCs. Especially everybody should purchase the license separately!
5- I doubt in this case, one can do everything he can do from CCR with DCS supplied hardware as well as vendor provided part in the same manner.
Actually I think this is not practical in this way. One solution might be that each vendor gives the logic to the DCS system integrator to implement, but the question remains how to test the package before delivery? What about the guarantee?! Who does the modifications at the time of commissioning and startup if necessary?!
Please let me know your comments.
Thanks,
Hamid
We are considering the use of Yokogawa CS3000 DCS as the main PCS. We have a number of vendor packages as well. To avoid having different hardware (and consequently different hardware, different software, different tools, different spare parts, different expertise, etc.) one idea is that all the controllers be the same.
Is it possible that each vendor purchases an FCS by Yokogawa instead of using other common PLCs by Siemens, Allen Bradley, ABB, etc?
I guess there are some challenges in this:
1- Everybody should be master in programming Yokogawa FCS which I doubt it is the case.
2- FCS must be a standalone controller so that everybody can test his own package at his own site.
3- Even if everybody uses the same FCS and software, there will be different programing techniques which makes the documentation and future troubleshooting very difficult.
4- FCS by Yokogawa seems to be more expensive than convenient PLCs. Especially everybody should purchase the license separately!
5- I doubt in this case, one can do everything he can do from CCR with DCS supplied hardware as well as vendor provided part in the same manner.
Actually I think this is not practical in this way. One solution might be that each vendor gives the logic to the DCS system integrator to implement, but the question remains how to test the package before delivery? What about the guarantee?! Who does the modifications at the time of commissioning and startup if necessary?!
Please let me know your comments.
Thanks,
Hamid
Since Chevron recently announced that they were moving from their previous vendor to Yokogawa, you might want to give some people at Chevron's tech center in Richmond California a shout to see if they will share their reasons for this.
If you don't know who to talk to, call Kari Mitchell or Constantine Lau or Bruce Jensen at Yokogawa Corp of America in Houston and they'll be (I am quite certain [evil grin]) happy to direct you.
Walt Boyes
Editor in Chief
Control magazine
www.controlglobal.com
blog:Sound OFF!! http://www.controlglobal.com/soundoff
_________________
Putman Media Inc.
555 W. Pierce Rd. Suite 301
Itasca, IL 60143
630-467-1301 x368
wboyes@putman.net
If you don't know who to talk to, call Kari Mitchell or Constantine Lau or Bruce Jensen at Yokogawa Corp of America in Houston and they'll be (I am quite certain [evil grin]) happy to direct you.
Walt Boyes
Editor in Chief
Control magazine
www.controlglobal.com
blog:Sound OFF!! http://www.controlglobal.com/soundoff
_________________
Putman Media Inc.
555 W. Pierce Rd. Suite 301
Itasca, IL 60143
630-467-1301 x368
wboyes@putman.net
hello Mr.Walt Boyes
Since Chevron recently announced that
they were moving from their previous
vendor to Yokogawa. will you please tell me what Contract is sign between Chevron and Yokogawa
Since Chevron recently announced that
they were moving from their previous
vendor to Yokogawa. will you please tell me what Contract is sign between Chevron and Yokogawa
I am not a party to contracts between end user companies and vendors. All I know is what they send me as press releases. If you want more information, contact either Chevron or Yokogawa.
Sorry,
Walt Boyes
Walt Boyes
Editor in Chief
Control magazine
www.controlglobal.com
blog:Sound OFF!! http://www.controlglobal.com/soundoff
_________________
Putman Media Inc.
555 W. Pierce Rd. Suite 301
Itasca, IL 60143
630-467-1301 x368
wboyes@putman.net
Sorry,
Walt Boyes
Walt Boyes
Editor in Chief
Control magazine
www.controlglobal.com
blog:Sound OFF!! http://www.controlglobal.com/soundoff
_________________
Putman Media Inc.
555 W. Pierce Rd. Suite 301
Itasca, IL 60143
630-467-1301 x368
wboyes@putman.net
YCA's DCS3000 (CENTUM CS) usually needs one FCS (field control station), with some RIO (remote I/O processor) an ICS (Operator Console) and an EWS (Engineering Work Station). Each of these hangs on the 'v-net'. Without talking with someone at YCA, (1-800-524-7378) I would say, No.
Better to ask your vendors to supply same plcs on all packages. And get it communicated to Cs3000 through modbus
>1- Everybody should be master in programming Yokogawa FCS which I doubt it is the case.>
You can have multiple people programming the same FCS.
>2- FCS must be a standalone controller so that everybody can test his own package at his own site.>
Yokogawa provides test functionality that utilizes PC only.
>3- Even if everybody uses the same FCS and software, there will be different programing techniques which makes the documentation and future troubleshooting very difficult.>
Standard methods are available.
>4- FCS by Yokogawa seems to be more expensive than convenient PLCs.
Especially everybody should purchase the license separately!>
Project Evaluation Licenses can be provided
>5- I doubt in this case, one can do everything he can do from CCR with DCS supplied hardware as well as vendor provided part in the same manner.>
Yokogawa has multiple hardware offering that are integrated whether PLC, Safety PLC, or DCS.
We are a system integrator of Yokogawa.
Ernest M Smith
GMP Inc.
610-331-4773
You can have multiple people programming the same FCS.
>2- FCS must be a standalone controller so that everybody can test his own package at his own site.>
Yokogawa provides test functionality that utilizes PC only.
>3- Even if everybody uses the same FCS and software, there will be different programing techniques which makes the documentation and future troubleshooting very difficult.>
Standard methods are available.
>4- FCS by Yokogawa seems to be more expensive than convenient PLCs.
Especially everybody should purchase the license separately!>
Project Evaluation Licenses can be provided
>5- I doubt in this case, one can do everything he can do from CCR with DCS supplied hardware as well as vendor provided part in the same manner.>
Yokogawa has multiple hardware offering that are integrated whether PLC, Safety PLC, or DCS.
We are a system integrator of Yokogawa.
Ernest M Smith
GMP Inc.
610-331-4773
From Control Engineering magazine...
Related articles from Control
Engineering magazine- Automation vendors boost biofuels
- Cyber security issues take center stage in 2009
- AIC Series presents new high energy storage chokes
- Decrease arc flash risk with new motor control center option
- Relays: Slim industrial relays have push-in terminal sockets
- 2009 Automation Integrator Guide
- Relays: Industrial relays for OEMs, process industries available in kits
- Relay: Differential current relay improves worker safety
- Integrators merge: Optimation grows again with Total System Design
- System integrator Bay-Tec Engineering becomes part of Emerson Process Management
Above articles copyright 2009 Reed Business Information.
Subject to its Terms of Use.
Your use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions set forth under Legal Notices and the Privacy Policy. Please read those terms and conditions carefully. Subject to the rights expressly reserved to others under Legal Notices, the content of this site and the compilation thereof is © 1999-2009 Control Technology Corporation. All rights reserved.
Our Advertisers
Help keep our servers running...
Patronize our advertisers!
Patronize our advertisers!




