Member Login
member
passwd
remember me on
this computer.

- join now -
- forgot username or password? -

Search

Jump to a Date

Sponsored Communities
Cool stuff
Select a topic of interest:
...and press:
Neat Stuff
Control.com Stuff

Visit our shop for nerds in control lifestyle products.

Fortune
"Well, if you can't believe what you read in a comic book, what *___can*
you believe?!"
-- Bullwinkle J. Moose [Jay Ward]
RSS Feed
RSS feed Use this link to get an RSS feed of the Control.com article flow, for private, non-commercial use only:
www.control.com/rss/
To get a personalized feed, become a member at no cost.
Select a Page Style
Select one of the following styles:
- BluFu
- Classic
(cookies required)
advertisement
from the Automation List department...
x-y velocity
Motion control, servos, steppers, etc. topic
Posted by Bruce on 8 October, 2007 - 3:22 pm
I have a small x-y gantry/bridge with an encoder on x leg and one on the y leg. A deposit nozzle is mounted on the bridge and is moved manually (by hand). I do not care where it is moved to, but I do need to know the velocity (i.e. speed) at which it is moving. Whether moving slow or fast, I need to deposit a consistent amount of material in a uniform bead. Does anyone know of a device or method that translates the x-y movement into a single (vectorized) analog output? The analog output will drive the depositor, from rest (zero) to some maximum (fastest hand motion).

Bruce.


Posted by Anonymous on 8 October, 2007 - 6:13 pm
Bruce,
Check out US Digital p/n EDAC2


Posted by Busse, Brian on 8 October, 2007 - 6:14 pm
Bruce,

There are many ways to solve this problem, the hard part is choosing which one fits the job. For that, your cursory description of the task is inadequate.

You don't mention anything about what, if any, control system is present that receives the encoder signals. Also absent is any mention of the encoder resolutions or expected pulse rates. Given the nature of the velocity feedback, a small PLC, single board computer, or even a bread-boarded PIC processor with digital inputs and an analog output are all workable. The math to convert the pulse train intervals into x and y velocities, and thus a motion vector, are relatively simple.

From your description, the velocity scalar is all that's needed, but a direction angle is basically a freebie. What's your budget? One off or multiple units? What's the maintenance support environment? Any bells and whistles desired?

Brian.


Posted by Curt Wuollet on 9 October, 2007 - 11:33 am
You can do this with a one-shot and a filter. The one-shot will output a fixed width pulse for every encoder count and the average of those pulses over time is proportional to frequency. Which in your case is velocity. With one for each axis, you can do the trig and scale for your depositor. You would want high res encoders to filter without too much lag.

Regards
cww

From Control Engineering magazine...
Related articles from Control Engineering magazine
Above articles copyright 2008 Reed Business Information. Subject to its Terms of Use.
Your use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions set forth under Legal Notices and the Privacy Policy. Please read those terms and conditions carefully. Subject to the rights expressly reserved to others under Legal Notices, the content of this site and the compilation thereof is © 1999-2008 Control Technology Corporation. All rights reserved.

Users of this site are benefiting from open source technologies, including PHP, MySQL and Apache. Be happy.

Internet Explorer 6.0 Fix

Advertisement
Our Advertisers
Help keep our servers running...
Patronize our advertisers!