Member Login
Search
Jump to a Date
Sponsored Communities
Cool stuff
Neat Stuff

Visit our shop for nerds in control lifestyle products.
Thermal Overload
The threads that wouldn't die...
- PC reliability?
- Windows, real time
- PID loops
- PCs vs. PLCs
- Replacing people
- MS 'monopoly'?
- Software quality
- Where do we go from here?
- Why pay?
- PC reliability?
- Windows, real time
- PID loops
- PCs vs. PLCs
- Replacing people
- MS 'monopoly'?
- Software quality
- Where do we go from here?
- Why pay?
Fortune
For every credibility gap, there is a gullibility fill.
-- R. Clopton
-- R. Clopton
RSS Feed
www.control.com/rss/
To get a personalized feed, become a member at no cost.
from the Power Plant Department department...
Is MARK VIe migration a MUST for water injection on a GE Frame 7?Is MARK VIe migration from MARK IV a MUST for water injection on a GE Frame 7?
Thanks,
John
Thanks,
John
I wouldn't have thought so John. I've never done water injection on a 7 as I'm mainly 60Hz. For a 5 or a 6 there is no problem. Who is telling you need MKIVe.
Does anyone else have any input here who are more familiar with MS7001?
Does anyone else have any input here who are more familiar with MS7001?
I don't think we have the whole story, but that's not the relevant point.
The relevant point is that GE doesn't support modification of Mark IV inputs and outputs (hasn't for years), and the current version of Water Injection requires a milliamp output signal to the variable frequency drive which powers the pump. And, the flowmeters would require either milliamp- or TTL inputs.
Also, programming the Mark IV to use a Wet Low NOx algorithm is not supported either.
The relevant point is that GE doesn't support modification of Mark IV inputs and outputs (hasn't for years), and the current version of Water Injection requires a milliamp output signal to the variable frequency drive which powers the pump. And, the flowmeters would require either milliamp- or TTL inputs.
Also, programming the Mark IV to use a Wet Low NOx algorithm is not supported either.
Sorry John, I meant "mainly 50Hz".
Your question is "is it a must?". All the answers here so far are correct in that it is not supported, no algorithm etc. However to be specific the answer is "no it is not a must". However one must answer the "how" question. From my past experiences, (I have worked with GE and done it on my own) I have used external PLC's or offloaded the task to the plant DCS. Most recently Steam injection to augment power and reduce Nox on a Mark II system was handled by the plant DCS.
From Control Engineering magazine...
Related articles from Control
Engineering magazine- Siemens announces motors, drives, and motion control advances
- ODVA announces new editions of CIP network specifications and testing of Ethernet/IP products
- Molex releases new connection system and expanded line of Ethernet switches
- Wurldtech Achilles cyber security testing
- OMAC guidelines ease design, programming, integration
- Webcast to examine best practices for adopting Microsoft Windows Vista
- Vision sensor inspects for defects at any part position, rotation
- Smart vision sensor features simple setup, high-speed inspection
- Youth: Name a Mars rover; get your hands on Science Chicago
Above articles copyright 2008 Reed Business Information.
Subject to its Terms of Use.
Your use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions set forth under Legal Notices and the Privacy Policy. Please read those terms and conditions carefully. Subject to the rights expressly reserved to others under Legal Notices, the content of this site and the compilation thereof is © 1999-2008 Control Technology Corporation. All rights reserved.
Our Advertisers
Help keep our servers running...
Patronize our advertisers!
Patronize our advertisers!




