Member Login
member
passwd
remember me on
this computer.

- join now -
- forgot username or password? -

Search

Jump to a Date

Sponsored Communities
Cool stuff
Select a topic of interest:
...and press:
Neat Stuff
Control.com Stuff

Visit our shop for nerds in control lifestyle products.

Fortune
AMAZING BUT TRUE ...

There is so much sand in Northern Africa that if it were spread out it
would completely cover the Sahara Desert.
RSS Feed
RSS feed Use this link to get an RSS feed of the Control.com article flow, for private, non-commercial use only:
www.control.com/rss/
To get a personalized feed, become a member at no cost.
Select a Page Style
Select one of the following styles:
- BluFu
- Classic
(cookies required)
advertisement
from the netiquette department...
Synchronizing 2 asynchron motor
Motion control, servos, steppers, etc. topic
Posted by Darius on 2 November, 2007 - 8:36 pm
Products from the molding machine are dropped on to conveyer and the motion is synchronized by two gear now. This can damage the molding machine if a foreign object go into the the molding machine. Molding machine will not stop because the motor can not detect any "torque-increase" due to large torque at the conveyer.

We plan to seperate the molding machine motor from the conveyer motor and need synchronizing both asynchron motors. 1 or 1/2 Hp for the molding machine and 5 Hp for the conveyer (Now a 5Hp motor drive both the molding machine and the conveyer).

Anybody can help?

Darius
puas@idola.net.id


Posted by Michael Griffin on 3 November, 2007 - 5:11 pm
It sounds as if you want to index the conveyor every cycle. That is, just run the conveyor briefly once each time the moulding machine closes up. You can do this via a variable speed drive which supports indexing (this gives you ramp up and ramp down), or just closing and opening a contactor (which can be harder on the contactor and motor).

Isn't this what the system is *already* doing though? I'm assuming the motor on the injection moulding machine (IMM) just runs to open or close the machine (via a cam drive) and stops when the machine is closed up. If it is, then you are just looking at duplicating the existing control hardware (in a smaller size) for the new motor.

Something that sounds a bit odd though is that the IMM needs a 1/2 or 1 HP motor, while the conveyor needs a 5 HP motor. Unless you have a very long cooling conveyor with a small IMM, then either I do not understand your description or there is some information missing.

What I have seen people more commonly do is to not try to coordinate the IMM with the cooling conveyor. They just run the conveyor continuously very slowly and adjust the conveyor speed to be a bit faster than the machine (so subsequent parts don't get dropped on previous ones). If the machine is running all the time (which it should be), then there is no difference between indexing and continuous running. If the IMM stops, then you have some empty gaps on the conveyor (as it keeps running), but that doesn't normally make any difference.


Posted by Darius on 5 November, 2007 - 4:06 pm
Thank you for your information. It is not injection molding, but pulp molding machine. We have 300m conveyer for drying the products.

The machine is not index but run continuously. The conveyer has hundreds of trays and the products must be put exactly on the middle of the tray continuously.

For details of the process, you may see http://www.emeryinternational.com/videos/54video.html
Any other suggestion?


Posted by Darius on 5 November, 2007 - 8:42 pm
Hello,

If the forming machine and the tray conveyer are not synchronized every time, not only will the products drop out the tray, but the machine will also clash the tray.

Especially when at startup, either the machine or the conveyer must run first to find the safe position for not having collisions, then both the machine and conveyer may run synchronously together.


Posted by Michael Griffin on 6 November, 2007 - 5:07 pm
I see that I had an incorrect impression of your process. It sounds as if what you want is similar to an electronic gearing application. Electronic gearing is using electronic controls to coordinate two or more motors in a manner as to give the effect of being joined by a shaft and gearbox. I would suggest talking to someone in your area who sells motion control (servo systems) about your application. Electronic gearing is a feature built into many drives, as this is a common requirement.


Posted by Darius on 6 November, 2007 - 8:58 pm
Michael,

Correct. What I need is electronic gearing, but instead of servo motor, I plan to use asynchron motor, which is cheaper. I cannot find anybody in my area that supplies this system. Maybe they have the products but they do not really understand the ability of the products. Do you have any idea which inverter from Schneider, Siemens, Omron, Toshiba or Mitshubishi provides this function?

Darius


Posted by Michael Griffin on 9 November, 2007 - 12:19 am
A vector drive with electronic gearing might be able to do this. I don't want to recommend a particular brand though. Hitachi has a vector drive with electronic gearing. I would suspect that all of the companies you have named have something equivalent. I would suggest that you pick out a couple of your favourite vendors and take this up with their applications people.

I haven't tried anything like this with a vector drive. I also don't know the details of the characteristics of the load. I don't know therefore if you would get good enough control from a vector drive for this.


Posted by Gilles Allard on 9 November, 2007 - 1:24 am
That function is available from many VFD suppliers. Yaskawa and Siemens come to my mind. The feature is often named "electronic line shaft" because it is used to synchronize two machines. For Yaskawa drives (G5 and F7 at least), a firmware change is required.


Posted by Ken Emmons Jr. on 6 November, 2007 - 8:18 pm
I would bite the bullet here and use servo motors. If you can time the servos to your machine with a digital IO line or an encoder signal you are much better off. With servos you can torque limit, but more useful is fatal following error which can detect a jam and kill your motor rather quickly if something goes wrong. This all depends on the failure mode of what breaks and what you have for gearing, etc, but with a servo you definitely have more control.

~Ken


Posted by William Sturm on 6 November, 2007 - 8:23 pm
Have you heard of Contrex/Fenner? They make synchronizing controls that will work with any variable speed drives that have an analog input. Their controls are pre-programmed for the application, you just setup the parameters. I used them years ago and they work well.

http://www.contrexinc.com/

Bill


Posted by Darius on 7 November, 2007 - 4:53 pm
I will contact contrexinc. My only worry is the technical support at our region.

May be asynchron motor at the conveyer and servo at the molding machine is a good idea.

Any other solution?

From Control Engineering magazine...
Related articles from Control Engineering magazine
Above articles copyright 2008 Reed Business Information. Subject to its Terms of Use.
Your use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions set forth under Legal Notices and the Privacy Policy. Please read those terms and conditions carefully. Subject to the rights expressly reserved to others under Legal Notices, the content of this site and the compilation thereof is © 1999-2008 Control Technology Corporation. All rights reserved.

Users of this site are benefiting from open source technologies, including PHP, MySQL and Apache. Be happy.

Internet Explorer 6.0 Fix

Advertisement
Our Advertisers
Help keep our servers running...
Patronize our advertisers!