Member Login
member
passwd
remember me on
this computer.

- join now -
- forgot username or password? -

Search

Jump to a Date

Sponsored Communities
Cool stuff
Select a topic of interest:
...and press:
Neat Stuff
Control.com Stuff

Visit our shop for nerds in control lifestyle products.

Fortune
Wasting time is an important part of living.
RSS Feed
RSS feed Use this link to get an RSS feed of the Control.com article flow, for private, non-commercial use only:
www.control.com/rss/
To get a personalized feed, become a member at no cost.
Select a Page Style
Select one of the following styles:
- BluFu
- Classic
(cookies required)
advertisement
from the inst department...
DCS and SER
Continuous process industries, DCS questions. topic
Posted by Anurag Rathi on 19 December, 2007 - 11:10 pm
What is the difference between DCS built-in sequence of events recorder (SER) & stand alone SER?


Posted by Radhakrishnan on 21 December, 2007 - 12:30 am
SER is a valuable tool in troubleshooting plant shutdowns. However, the resolution of the SER messages is a crucial factor. A stand-alone SER, typically, has 1 msec resolution.

When SER is implemented in DCS, the scan time is the resolution. This can run into several hundred milli seconds. SER with a resolution of say 100 msec. won't be of much use. Some DCS vendors provide contact input modules that have built-in Sequence Of Events capability. The time stamping, with 1 msec. resolution, is done at the module itself. With this type of set up, usually a dedicated SOE server is required.

There are many TMR systems that have the SOE option built into the input modules. To name a few - ICS Trusted, GE Speedtronic Mark VI/VIe, etc. The resolution is 1 msec.


Posted by anurag rathi on 22 December, 2007 - 2:43 am
Thanks a lot.


Posted by Rishi on 23 December, 2007 - 4:40 pm
Most of the DCS vendors now a days provided SOE with stamp time of 1 millisecond. same is the case with SER. There are both plus and minus of using stand alone SER.

First thing if you use stand alone SER then u have wire up all the contacts upto SER card through all sort of fuses. If the fuse of SER is blown off u will never know until and unless the alarm is configured as alarm to open and the engineer checks SER daily. But in DCS/PLC the SOE picks data directly from the input card used for process control. So any failure of fuse is immidiatly notified to operator as process disturbance and he can get it rectified immidiatly.

On the other hand DCS/PLC will show SER only of the tags hooked up. e.g. Boiler DCS/PLC will show SER for Boilers only not for Balance of plant. To get that points in DCS SER you have to hook all those points to DCS/PLC which involves huge financial cost and added burden on the controller.

Still i will go for the SOE inbuilt in the DCS/PLC coz it makes ur life very easy while analysing any trip. Single fuse blown in case of stand alone SER can give you sleeples nights. Just imagine the turbine tripped on the same parameters whose fuse has blown off along with two other tripping parameters. Keep breaking ur heads and keep guessing...

On Dec 19, 2007 11:10 pm, Anurag Rathi wrote:
What is the difference between DCS built-in sequence of events recorder (SER) & stand alone SER?

( Complete thread: http://www.control.com/thread/1026242265 )

From Control Engineering magazine...
Related articles from Control Engineering magazine
Above articles copyright 2008 Reed Business Information. Subject to its Terms of Use.
Your use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions set forth under Legal Notices and the Privacy Policy. Please read those terms and conditions carefully. Subject to the rights expressly reserved to others under Legal Notices, the content of this site and the compilation thereof is © 1999-2008 Control Technology Corporation. All rights reserved.

Users of this site are benefiting from open source technologies, including PHP, MySQL and Apache. Be happy.

Internet Explorer 6.0 Fix

Advertisement
Our Advertisers
Help keep our servers running...
Patronize our advertisers!