Member Login
Search
Past & Future Posts
Sponsored Communities
Neat Stuff

Visit our shop for nerds in control lifestyle products.
Cool stuff
Thermal Overload
The threads that wouldn't die...
- PC reliability?
- Windows, real time
- PID loops
- PCs vs. PLCs
- Replacing people
- MS 'monopoly'?
- Software quality
- Where do we go from here?
- Why pay?
- PC reliability?
- Windows, real time
- PID loops
- PCs vs. PLCs
- Replacing people
- MS 'monopoly'?
- Software quality
- Where do we go from here?
- Why pay?
Fortune
Life is to you a dashing and bold adventure.
RSS Feed
www.control.com/rss
from the Protection department...
Differential protectionDifferential protection for a T/F operates on the difference of current entering & leaving the T/F.
But current entering or leaving a T/F is never equal. Please explain?
But current entering or leaving a T/F is never equal. Please explain?
Responding to Sunny's 06-Mar-08 (00:23) query... an excellent question!
The use of differential-relaying to protect a transformer against Transformer-Faults, is far more complicated than that used for generators because of:
1) Current-inrush upon energization, which is, by far, the most critical of all of the factors.
2) Mismatch due to differences in high-side and low-side CT-ratios, transformer types, saturation curves types, and burdens.
3) The transformer's impedance, which introduces not only a magnitude change but a phase-shift as well.
4) The phase-shift imposed by D-Y or Y-D winding connections.
The effects of almost all of the above are controlled in the design and application of differential-relays for transformer-fault protection. For very severe mismatch cases, auxiliary CT are added!
Let me know if additional detail is required!
Regards, Phil Corso (cepsicon@aol.com)
The use of differential-relaying to protect a transformer against Transformer-Faults, is far more complicated than that used for generators because of:
1) Current-inrush upon energization, which is, by far, the most critical of all of the factors.
2) Mismatch due to differences in high-side and low-side CT-ratios, transformer types, saturation curves types, and burdens.
3) The transformer's impedance, which introduces not only a magnitude change but a phase-shift as well.
4) The phase-shift imposed by D-Y or Y-D winding connections.
The effects of almost all of the above are controlled in the design and application of differential-relays for transformer-fault protection. For very severe mismatch cases, auxiliary CT are added!
Let me know if additional detail is required!
Regards, Phil Corso (cepsicon@aol.com)
Please give some additional detail.
Sunny, perhaps an example will help...
Given: Two-winding transformer; 30MVA; Dy11; HV-side, 69.0kV, 300/5 CT; LV-side, 11.5kV, 3000/5 CT.
Find: Percent unbalance?
Procedure:
HV-side, Amps = 30,000 / (Sqrt (3) x 69.0) = 251A, CT sec = 251/60 = 4.18A, Irelay = 4.18A.
LV-side, Amps = 30,000 / (Sqrt (3) x 11.5) = 1,506A, CT sec = 1506/600 = 2.41A, Irelay = Sqrt (3) x 2.51 = 4.35 A
The restraint-coil current from the HV-side 4.18A, while that from the LV-side is 4.35A. Their difference, 0.17A, would flow through the relay’s operating-coil. The higher percent mismatch, referenced to the lower current, is (0.17/4.18) x 100 or 4.1%. In this example, the mismatch is well within the limits of typical transformer differential relays.
Keep in mind, however, that each manufacture has specific tolerance values, as well as selection options to minimize the mismatch even further. Also, to keep it simple, I did not consider the impact of inrush current, nor transformer tap-settings!
Lastly, please search the Control List archive for like topics, as well as text-books and reference documentation that cover the subject in greater detail!
Given: Two-winding transformer; 30MVA; Dy11; HV-side, 69.0kV, 300/5 CT; LV-side, 11.5kV, 3000/5 CT.
Find: Percent unbalance?
Procedure:
HV-side, Amps = 30,000 / (Sqrt (3) x 69.0) = 251A, CT sec = 251/60 = 4.18A, Irelay = 4.18A.
LV-side, Amps = 30,000 / (Sqrt (3) x 11.5) = 1,506A, CT sec = 1506/600 = 2.41A, Irelay = Sqrt (3) x 2.51 = 4.35 A
The restraint-coil current from the HV-side 4.18A, while that from the LV-side is 4.35A. Their difference, 0.17A, would flow through the relay’s operating-coil. The higher percent mismatch, referenced to the lower current, is (0.17/4.18) x 100 or 4.1%. In this example, the mismatch is well within the limits of typical transformer differential relays.
Keep in mind, however, that each manufacture has specific tolerance values, as well as selection options to minimize the mismatch even further. Also, to keep it simple, I did not consider the impact of inrush current, nor transformer tap-settings!
Lastly, please search the Control List archive for like topics, as well as text-books and reference documentation that cover the subject in greater detail!
From Control Engineering magazine...
Related articles from Control Engineering magazine- Integrating PLM, ERP, MES behind the scenes
- Enterprise data historian supports management of power distribution
- Digital factory interface: XML control logic standard accepted by AutomationML
- Colfax Corp. acquires Fairmount Automation
- Oil & gas industry controller benefits from embedded database
- Wonderware names InSource “Wonderware Southeast” partner
- Researcher wins grant for holographic instrument panel controls
- Rittal launches Ri4Power power management system
Above articles copyright 2008 Reed Business Information. Subject to its Terms of Use.
Your use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions set forth under Legal Notices and the Privacy Policy. Please read those terms and conditions carefully. Subject to the rights expressly reserved to others under Legal Notices, the content of this site and the compilation thereof is © 1999-2008 Control Technology Corporation. All rights reserved.
Users of this site are benefiting from open source technologies, including PHP, PostgreSQL and Apache. Be happy.
Our Advertisers
Help keep our servers running...
Patronize our advertisers!
Patronize our advertisers!



