Member Login
member
passwd
remember me on
this computer.

- join now -
- forgot username or password? -

Search

Jump to a Date

Sponsored Communities
Cool stuff
Select a topic of interest:
...and press:
Neat Stuff
Control.com Stuff

Visit our shop for nerds in control lifestyle products.

Fortune
Reality is for people who lack imagination.
RSS Feed
RSS feed Use this link to get an RSS feed of the Control.com article flow, for private, non-commercial use only:
www.control.com/rss/
To get a personalized feed, become a member at no cost.
Select a Page Style
Select one of the following styles:
- BluFu
- Classic
(cookies required)
advertisement
from the Automation List department...
PFR (Primary Frequency Regulation) test
Engineering and workplace issues. topic
Posted by Genevieve on 18 March, 2008 - 12:11 am
I need to design a PFR test for a MKV control system of a GE 9E gas turbine. The test is supposed to be like that: give the control system virtual signal of frequency change, and observe the FSR and power response.

My question is: how to give the virtual signal of frequency change when grid frequency is stable? Can I change the TNH signal?


Posted by CSA on 18 March, 2008 - 11:57 pm
I believe GE sells a software modification which includes a testing method for this requirement.


Posted by Genevieve on 19 March, 2008 - 12:01 am
Hi, still me.

I have some supplements: I have made a Matlab Simulink model according to MKV droop control logic. This model will be used in electric power grid stability calculation. I designed this test to certify that the simulation model is correct.
In droop speed control mode, frequency variation (TNH) will cause TNR and FSR variation and affect power output. Because TNR is a calculated value, it looks only changing TNH can imitate a grid frequency variation. So I want to know if the TNH signal can be changed during operation.

Thanks for the help.


Posted by a_w_p_d on 27 March, 2008 - 2:23 am
Hi,

We are a GE MKVI 9FA, we had concerns with PFR in that once the freq stabilised after a freq dip the load on the GT dropped off well below the PLC set point.

GE did some testing by giving the MK1 logic a false freq dip signal so they could monitor the response. However, this was and is GE know how. If you can get them to tell you how or to give you the means to do so...

Good luck.

From Control Engineering magazine...
Related articles from Control Engineering magazine
Above articles copyright 2008 Reed Business Information. Subject to its Terms of Use.
Your use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions set forth under Legal Notices and the Privacy Policy. Please read those terms and conditions carefully. Subject to the rights expressly reserved to others under Legal Notices, the content of this site and the compilation thereof is © 1999-2008 Control Technology Corporation. All rights reserved.

Users of this site are benefiting from open source technologies, including PHP, MySQL and Apache. Be happy.

Internet Explorer 6.0 Fix

Advertisement
Our Advertisers
Help keep our servers running...
Patronize our advertisers!