Member Login
member
passwd
remember me on this computer.

- join now -

Search

Neat Stuff

Visit our shop for nerds in control lifestyle products.

Cool stuff
Select a topic of interest:
...and press:
Fortune
Some people around here wouldn't recognize subtlety if it hit them on the head.
RSS Feed
RSS feed Use this link to get an RSS feed of the Control.com article flow, for private, non-commercial use only:
www.control.com/rss
Select a Page Style
Select one of the following styles:
- BluFu
- Classic
(cookies required)
from the How far can I go? department...
Current transformer secondary distance
Applications topic
advertisement
Posted by M.Schultz on 25 March, 2008 - 9:43 pm
Using a standard "donut" CT (say 100:5 2va burden) how do I determine the maximum distance I can run the secondary output before losing accuracy?

Posted by Phil Corso, PE on 25 March, 2008 - 10:51 pm
Responding to M. Schultz's 25-Mar-08 (21:43) query... Accuracy is primarily (excuse the pun) affected by burden and the CTs secondary-winding impedance:

Assume your CT conformed to USA ANSI C57.13, then its Burden Designation would be B-0.2, which means the burden should not exceed 0.2 Ohm. This corresponds to a maximum resistance and reactance of 0.180 and 0.086 0hm, respectively.

If additional detail is required, let me know!

Regards, Phil Corso (cepsicon @ aol. com)

Posted by Roy Matson on 28 March, 2008 - 11:45 pm
So Phil,

Being unfamiliar with the ANSI reference, are you telling us that the burden rating of a CT is meaningless? If so what is the point of having CTs with different burden ratings? I would have thought you could apply Ohm's law to get an impedance of 0.08 Ohms.

I have sometimes seen a CT in the MCC connected to an Ammeter on the control panel several hundred feet away, typically 0-1 Amp from memory. I assume that under startup conditions the burden is exceeded but from a Ammeters point of view this would be a good thing, i.e. pegged to the stop but not by too much.

Your ANSI reference, does that refer to metering, protection or both?

Regards,
Roy

Posted by Phil Corso, PE on 29 March, 2008 - 11:11 pm
Roy, answering your questions in the order presented:

1) What did I write that led you to believe I said that burden was meaningless? The R and X values I provided are the maximum burden for the CT cited in the example! As a matter of fact its rating was given as 5.0 VA!

2) The number of CT burdens is limited to a few values.

3) Application of Ohm’s law yielding 0.08 Ohm would provide a burden 2 and 1/2 times the recommended value!

4) What was the point you were making with your ammeter example? That one shouldn't use Standards?

5) The Standard I referred to covered metering CTs!

Regards, Phil

From Control Engineering magazine...
Related articles from Control Engineering magazine
Above articles copyright 2008 Reed Business Information. Subject to its Terms of Use.

Your use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions set forth under Legal Notices and the Privacy Policy. Please read those terms and conditions carefully. Subject to the rights expressly reserved to others under Legal Notices, the content of this site and the compilation thereof is © 1999-2008 Control Technology Corporation. All rights reserved.

Users of this site are benefiting from open source technologies, including PHP, PostgreSQL and Apache. Be happy.

Advertisement
Our Advertisers
Help keep our servers running...
Patronize our advertisers!