Welcome to Control.com, the global online community of automation professionals.
Control.com - Nerds in Control
Member Login
Search
Past & Future Posts
Sponsored Communities
Neat Stuff
Visit our shop for nerds in control lifestyle products.
Cool stuff
Thermal Overload
The threads that wouldn't die...
- PC reliability?
- Windows, real time
- PID loops
- PCs vs. PLCs
- Replacing people
- MS 'monopoly'?
- Software quality
- Where do we go from here?
- Why pay?
- PC reliability?
- Windows, real time
- PID loops
- PCs vs. PLCs
- Replacing people
- MS 'monopoly'?
- Software quality
- Where do we go from here?
- Why pay?
Fortune
The algorithm for finding the longest path in a graph is NP-complete.
For you systems people, that means it's *real slow*.
-- Bart Miller
For you systems people, that means it's *real slow*.
-- Bart Miller
RSS Feed
Use this link to get an RSS feed of the Control.com article flow, for private, non-commercial use only:www.control.com/rss
from the Automation List department...
ControlLogix and C200 Honeywell
Does anyone know how to communicate to a ControlLogix PLC with a Honeywell C200 by ControlNet?
I used RSLinx and everything looks great, I can see the entire network (ControlLogix and all the Honeywell components) on the RSWho, and when I used the RSNetworx for Cnet I also can scheduled the network and everything is recognized, but my problem is on the Logix5000, becasue if a add a PLC-5 on the I/O configuration throws an error "invalid segment", on the other hand I erase the PLC-5 and add a generic CNB module but after the scheduling throws me the same error.
I used RSLinx and everything looks great, I can see the entire network (ControlLogix and all the Honeywell components) on the RSWho, and when I used the RSNetworx for Cnet I also can scheduled the network and everything is recognized, but my problem is on the Logix5000, becasue if a add a PLC-5 on the I/O configuration throws an error "invalid segment", on the other hand I erase the PLC-5 and add a generic CNB module but after the scheduling throws me the same error.
From Control Engineering magazine...
Related articles from Control Engineering magazine
- Portable computing: Operators can be mobile with rugged HMI
- Whitepaper: Small form factor HMIs evolve
- PLM: Web-based operations management
- Remote control: Get behind firewalls—securely
- Security: Yokogawa partners to add industrial firewall
- Performance intelligence: SmartSignal, General Physics deal focuses on expertise exchange
- ABB update: User conference, exhibition, flow, SCADA, wireless
- Interoperability: OPC for embedded applications
Above articles copyright 2008 Reed Business Information. Subject to its Terms of Use.
Your use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions set forth under Legal Notices and the Privacy Policy. Please read those terms and conditions carefully. Subject to the rights expressly reserved to others under Legal Notices, the content of this site and the compilation thereof is © 1999-2008 Control Technology Corporation. All rights reserved.
Users of this site are benefiting from open source technologies, including PHP, PostgreSQL and Apache. Be happy.
Our Advertisers
Help keep our servers running...
Patronize our advertisers!
Patronize our advertisers!