Member Login
Search
Past & Future Posts
Sponsored Communities
Neat Stuff

Visit our shop for nerds in control lifestyle products.
Cool stuff
Thermal Overload
The threads that wouldn't die...
- PC reliability?
- Windows, real time
- PID loops
- PCs vs. PLCs
- Replacing people
- MS 'monopoly'?
- Software quality
- Where do we go from here?
- Why pay?
- PC reliability?
- Windows, real time
- PID loops
- PCs vs. PLCs
- Replacing people
- MS 'monopoly'?
- Software quality
- Where do we go from here?
- Why pay?
Fortune
Veni, Vidi, VISA:
I came, I saw, I did a little shopping.
I came, I saw, I did a little shopping.
RSS Feed
www.control.com/rss
from the DCS Vendor Interconnectivity Dreams department...
Hybrid Yokogawa CS3000 and Honeywell TDC3000 Plant Control SystemWe are looking at possibly replacing a TDC3000 with a CS3000 in a series of staged cutovers on a poorly unitised plant, so have interim periods where
1)Yoko FCSs will need to exchange interlocks and process data data with Honeywell HPM/APM/LM
2) Yoko HIS stations can read/write Honeywell HPM/APM/LM via LCN/NIM with view to running plant from HIS after first shutdown e.g. need trends, alarms, faceplates connected, etc.
We are trying to avoid hardwire interfacing due to number of signals.
We could use mailbox PLCs with a couple of Modbus ports or similar to join the systems but this is not preferred if some kind of OPC-OPC (ExaOPC<->AppNode) solution has been shown to work previously - we need maximum flexibility to cope with possible unexpected variations in staging/cutover battery limits and order.
Anyone got any experience with this and if so any kind of indication of performance?
1)Yoko FCSs will need to exchange interlocks and process data data with Honeywell HPM/APM/LM
2) Yoko HIS stations can read/write Honeywell HPM/APM/LM via LCN/NIM with view to running plant from HIS after first shutdown e.g. need trends, alarms, faceplates connected, etc.
We are trying to avoid hardwire interfacing due to number of signals.
We could use mailbox PLCs with a couple of Modbus ports or similar to join the systems but this is not preferred if some kind of OPC-OPC (ExaOPC<->AppNode) solution has been shown to work previously - we need maximum flexibility to cope with possible unexpected variations in staging/cutover battery limits and order.
Anyone got any experience with this and if so any kind of indication of performance?
Yokogawa has products called 'Generic Subsystem Gateway Package' and 'System Integration OPC
Client Package' that may help you through the initial steps of your conversion. I would try to migrate away from OPC ASAP.
Client Package' that may help you through the initial steps of your conversion. I would try to migrate away from OPC ASAP.
From Control Engineering magazine...
Related articles from Control Engineering magazine- OPC: Painless migration, classic OPC DA to OPC UA, partership
- Easier: panel designs, short-circuit current rating compliance
- MechatronicsZone road show kicks off
- ODVA, DeviceNet: New CIP specs; ControlNet added; 2009 meeting
- Partnership: Advanced, interoperable motion control, machine tools
- Protect intellectual property: Encrypt firmware, control code
- Embedded, wireless devices, dynamic IP routing
- Portable computing: Operators can be mobile with rugged HMI
Above articles copyright 2008 Reed Business Information. Subject to its Terms of Use.
Your use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions set forth under Legal Notices and the Privacy Policy. Please read those terms and conditions carefully. Subject to the rights expressly reserved to others under Legal Notices, the content of this site and the compilation thereof is © 1999-2008 Control Technology Corporation. All rights reserved.
Users of this site are benefiting from open source technologies, including PHP, PostgreSQL and Apache. Be happy.
Our Advertisers
Help keep our servers running...
Patronize our advertisers!
Patronize our advertisers!



