Member Login
Search
Past & Future Posts
Sponsored Communities
Neat Stuff

Visit our shop for nerds in control lifestyle products.
Cool stuff
Thermal Overload
The threads that wouldn't die...
- PC reliability?
- Windows, real time
- PID loops
- PCs vs. PLCs
- Replacing people
- MS 'monopoly'?
- Software quality
- Where do we go from here?
- Why pay?
- PC reliability?
- Windows, real time
- PID loops
- PCs vs. PLCs
- Replacing people
- MS 'monopoly'?
- Software quality
- Where do we go from here?
- Why pay?
Fortune
The only way to learn a new programming language is by writing programs in it.
- Brian Kernighan
- Brian Kernighan
RSS Feed
www.control.com/rss
from the Peer to Peer department...
DCS Architecture ProblemI am looking for system having DCS as main controller and SIL-3 PLC for critical operations. I want to generate some of the process interlocks from DCS and want to convey it to PLC. PLC status should also be communicated back to DCS. Please suggest any product of such sort having high speed communication and also remote I/O for far off plants (500 m)
Be very careful with this, it really depends on what kind of interlocks you are talking about. If you want to ensure that you maintain your SIL rating in the PLC it would be advisable to hardwire your interlocks. By using the DCS as the source of the interlock you are reducing the reliability of that interlock. You could hardwire the interlocks, or use a comms bus like Modbus or Profibus, but the specifics will depend on the capabilities of both your DCS and the PLC and the required reliability level of that interlock. You need to engineer these on a case by case basis.
Status information back to the DCS would be relatively easy, you could use a Profibus link or similar. If you are only indicating to the HMI you could use OPC. Once again this depends on the particular systems you have.
Chris Jennings
Status information back to the DCS would be relatively easy, you could use a Profibus link or similar. If you are only indicating to the HMI you could use OPC. Once again this depends on the particular systems you have.
Chris Jennings
Thanks Chris for your reply. I have one more question, will making controllers of individual plant sections independent to each other will make my system more reliable (so as to avoid peer to peer communication)?
From Control Engineering magazine...
Related articles from Control Engineering magazine- OPC: Painless migration, classic OPC DA to OPC UA, partership
- Easier: panel designs, short-circuit current rating compliance
- MechatronicsZone road show kicks off
- Partnership: Advanced, interoperable motion control, machine tools
- Protect intellectual property: Encrypt firmware, control code
- Portable computing: Operators can be mobile with rugged HMI
- Whitepaper: Small form factor HMIs evolve
- Remote control: Get behind firewalls—securely
- Report asks: Will DIN-rail PCs with I/O revolutionize industrial PCs?
Above articles copyright 2008 Reed Business Information. Subject to its Terms of Use.
Your use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions set forth under Legal Notices and the Privacy Policy. Please read those terms and conditions carefully. Subject to the rights expressly reserved to others under Legal Notices, the content of this site and the compilation thereof is © 1999-2008 Control Technology Corporation. All rights reserved.
Users of this site are benefiting from open source technologies, including PHP, PostgreSQL and Apache. Be happy.
Our Advertisers
Help keep our servers running...
Patronize our advertisers!
Patronize our advertisers!



