Member Login
Search
Past & Future Posts
Sponsored Communities
Neat Stuff

Visit our shop for nerds in control lifestyle products.
Cool stuff
Thermal Overload
The threads that wouldn't die...
- PC reliability?
- Windows, real time
- PID loops
- PCs vs. PLCs
- Replacing people
- MS 'monopoly'?
- Software quality
- Where do we go from here?
- Why pay?
- PC reliability?
- Windows, real time
- PID loops
- PCs vs. PLCs
- Replacing people
- MS 'monopoly'?
- Software quality
- Where do we go from here?
- Why pay?
Fortune
Maryann's Law:
You can always find what you're not looking for.
You can always find what you're not looking for.
RSS Feed
www.control.com/rss
from the re-dangle-cy department...
SLC 5/05 Redundancy...Is it possible to have a redundant SLC 5/05? We're having a difficult time searching if it's possible, and up to now the answer is unclear. Can someone answer my question? Thanks...
And it is also possible to have a redundant power supply using SLC 5/05? Can someone please give a link that provides clarity to my question? Thanks a lot...
And it is also possible to have a redundant power supply using SLC 5/05? Can someone please give a link that provides clarity to my question? Thanks a lot...
There was some kind of redundant SLC module but it only worked on 5/04s. It was pretty kludgey and I think it is no longer available.
Go with the ControlLogix system if you need redundancy. It works very well.
Go with the ControlLogix system if you need redundancy. It works very well.
Required practical exposure on ControlLogix redundancy. Prolific is conducting training program on ControlLogix. Mail to pune@prolifictraining.com
There's the 'Backup Scanner Module' that allows you to build a redundant SLC system, with some dedicated communication channel between the cards to allow each PLC system to exchange data and detect the health of the other. Also allows shared IO. AB provide some example code, but after that its a case of writing a lot of your own code to make a solid redundant system. It works, but not that elegantly. For example, if there's any significant amount of data to keep in synch, a lot of block transfers are needed to move data across a backplane that was never really designed for that kind of work.
Like the other guy says, I'd use ControlLogix next time I had this kind of requirement.
Carl
www.westwoodtec.co.uk
Like the other guy says, I'd use ControlLogix next time I had this kind of requirement.
Carl
www.westwoodtec.co.uk
From Control Engineering magazine...
Related articles from Control Engineering magazine- OPC: Painless migration, classic OPC DA to OPC UA, partership
- Easier: panel designs, short-circuit current rating compliance
- MechatronicsZone road show kicks off
- Partnership: Advanced, interoperable motion control, machine tools
- Protect intellectual property: Encrypt firmware, control code
- Portable computing: Operators can be mobile with rugged HMI
- Whitepaper: Small form factor HMIs evolve
- Remote control: Get behind firewalls—securely
- Report asks: Will DIN-rail PCs with I/O revolutionize industrial PCs?
Above articles copyright 2008 Reed Business Information. Subject to its Terms of Use.
Your use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions set forth under Legal Notices and the Privacy Policy. Please read those terms and conditions carefully. Subject to the rights expressly reserved to others under Legal Notices, the content of this site and the compilation thereof is © 1999-2008 Control Technology Corporation. All rights reserved.
Users of this site are benefiting from open source technologies, including PHP, PostgreSQL and Apache. Be happy.
Our Advertisers
Help keep our servers running...
Patronize our advertisers!
Patronize our advertisers!



