Member Login
Search
Past & Future Posts
Sponsored Communities
Neat Stuff

Visit our shop for nerds in control lifestyle products.
Cool stuff
Thermal Overload
The threads that wouldn't die...
- PC reliability?
- Windows, real time
- PID loops
- PCs vs. PLCs
- Replacing people
- MS 'monopoly'?
- Software quality
- Where do we go from here?
- Why pay?
- PC reliability?
- Windows, real time
- PID loops
- PCs vs. PLCs
- Replacing people
- MS 'monopoly'?
- Software quality
- Where do we go from here?
- Why pay?
Fortune
X-rated movies are all alike ... the only thing they leave to the
imagination is the plot.
imagination is the plot.
RSS Feed
www.control.com/rss
from the Do or Not Do department...
GroundingHello,
I have a question about grounding according to code you are suppose to ground non-current carrying parts but we have some remote flow meters out in the field and we tie our grounds for the 110 vac to the ground bar which is tied to the ground grid but it seems we are popping electronics left an right so should we pull the ground of the backplate.
I have a question about grounding according to code you are suppose to ground non-current carrying parts but we have some remote flow meters out in the field and we tie our grounds for the 110 vac to the ground bar which is tied to the ground grid but it seems we are popping electronics left an right so should we pull the ground of the backplate.
Steve,
It sounds like your electronics are being smoked by large potential difference between the field and the supply/input module, e.g. lightning. I would ground back to the supply as per code, but also provide a good solid ground strap from transmitter to the process line and perhaps some lightning protection and a signal isolator at the receiver. You might even consider a wireless link.
Which end are you having the problem, at the transmitter or receiver?
Roy
It sounds like your electronics are being smoked by large potential difference between the field and the supply/input module, e.g. lightning. I would ground back to the supply as per code, but also provide a good solid ground strap from transmitter to the process line and perhaps some lightning protection and a signal isolator at the receiver. You might even consider a wireless link.
Which end are you having the problem, at the transmitter or receiver?
Roy
From Control Engineering magazine...
Related articles from Control Engineering magazine- OPC: Painless migration, classic OPC DA to OPC UA, partership
- Easier: panel designs, short-circuit current rating compliance
- MechatronicsZone road show kicks off
- ODVA, DeviceNet: New CIP specs; ControlNet added; 2009 meeting
- Partnership: Advanced, interoperable motion control, machine tools
- Protect intellectual property: Encrypt firmware, control code
- Embedded, wireless devices, dynamic IP routing
- Portable computing: Operators can be mobile with rugged HMI
Above articles copyright 2008 Reed Business Information. Subject to its Terms of Use.
Your use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions set forth under Legal Notices and the Privacy Policy. Please read those terms and conditions carefully. Subject to the rights expressly reserved to others under Legal Notices, the content of this site and the compilation thereof is © 1999-2008 Control Technology Corporation. All rights reserved.
Users of this site are benefiting from open source technologies, including PHP, PostgreSQL and Apache. Be happy.
Our Advertisers
Help keep our servers running...
Patronize our advertisers!
Patronize our advertisers!



