Member Login
member
passwd
remember me on
this computer.

- join now -
- forgot username or password? -

Search

Sponsored Communities
Cool stuff
Select a topic of interest:
...and press:
Neat Stuff
Control.com Stuff

Visit our shop for nerds in control lifestyle products.

Fortune
If you only have a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail.
-- Maslow
RSS Feed
RSS feed Use this link to get an RSS feed of the Control.com article flow, for private, non-commercial use only:
www.control.com/rss/
To get a personalized feed, become a member at no cost.
Select a Page Style
Select one of the following styles:
- BluFu
- Classic
(cookies required)
advertisement
from the Mark V department...
What is the "Contact Sense" for IO report in Mark V system?
Human-Machine Interface and SCADA. topic
Posted by Richard on 13 May, 2008 - 12:57 am
I am looking for someone who knows what is the "Contact Sense" for IO report in Mark V system. Your prompt attention to this matter would be highly appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

Richard


Posted by CSA on 13 May, 2008 - 10:55 pm
Contact If the device listed is a contact, this record will
provide its de-energized condition or "contact sense."
Sense e.g.: NO = Normally Open,
NC = Normally Closed
C = Form C: Used in conjunction with NO and NC relay outputs.

The above is from the legend in the front of the I/O Report; not very much information, unfortunately.

The *INTENT* of this column is to describe the condition of the de-actuated state of the contact being used to provide the indication. What is the de-actuated state? The state of the contacts of the device at "standard temperature & pressure" when pulled off the shelf of the manufacturer.

In other words, at approximately 60 deg F, 14.7 psia, 60% relative humidity, NO refers to the normally open contact of the device (pressure switch, temperature switch, limit switch) without pressure or temperature or actuation by the position of some device.

The key word for this document is *INTENT* because unless you have verified the accuracy of the information or you know the person who wrote or edited the document for accuracy, you should treat it as such--not verified.

When people ask questions like this, I always wonder why. Are they having problems with some device? Did someone replace a device and not reconnect it in the *AS-FOUND* condition and are looking for some piece of paper to tell them what the correct wiring should be? Did someone actually read the I/O Report and then find a device connected to the panel which has been working properly but now questions whether or not it has been connected correctly since commissioning?

From Control Engineering magazine...
Related articles from Control Engineering magazine
Above articles copyright 2008 Reed Business Information. Subject to its Terms of Use.
Your use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions set forth under Legal Notices and the Privacy Policy. Please read those terms and conditions carefully. Subject to the rights expressly reserved to others under Legal Notices, the content of this site and the compilation thereof is © 1999-2008 Control Technology Corporation. All rights reserved.

Users of this site are benefiting from open source technologies, including PHP, MySQL and Apache. Be happy.

Internet Explorer 6.0 Fix

Advertisement
Our Advertisers
Help keep our servers running...
Patronize our advertisers!