Member Login
Search
Jump to a Date
Sponsored Communities
Cool stuff
Neat Stuff

Visit our shop for nerds in control lifestyle products.
Thermal Overload
The threads that wouldn't die...
- PC reliability?
- Windows, real time
- PID loops
- PCs vs. PLCs
- Replacing people
- MS 'monopoly'?
- Software quality
- Where do we go from here?
- Why pay?
- PC reliability?
- Windows, real time
- PID loops
- PCs vs. PLCs
- Replacing people
- MS 'monopoly'?
- Software quality
- Where do we go from here?
- Why pay?
Fortune
If it's Tuesday, this must be someone else's fortune.
RSS Feed
www.control.com/rss/
To get a personalized feed, become a member at no cost.
from the Automation List department...
During reverse power what type of motor does the alternator become?I would like to know, during a reverse power trip, what type of motor does the alternator become?
An electric motor.
Seriously, it depends on the reason for the trip. If you're talking about a lack of sufficient power from the prime mover to keep a synchronous generator (alternator) running at synchronous speed when connected to a grid in parallel with other alternators when there is no loss of field excitation, it will become a synchronous motor.
If there is a loss of field excitation, then it will be an induction motor.
Seriously, it depends on the reason for the trip. If you're talking about a lack of sufficient power from the prime mover to keep a synchronous generator (alternator) running at synchronous speed when connected to a grid in parallel with other alternators when there is no loss of field excitation, it will become a synchronous motor.
If there is a loss of field excitation, then it will be an induction motor.
For the record, while reverse power protection detects reverse power flow into the generator, its primary function is to protect the prime mover! Thus, operation requires that excitation be available so that the generator becomes a motor.
But, as CSA suggested, if reverse power and excitation loss occurred simultaneously (e.g., worst-case resulting in zero field-current) there is sufficient field-flux, although decaying, to provide torque to drive the prime mover!
Regards, Phil Corso (cepsicon@aol.com)
But, as CSA suggested, if reverse power and excitation loss occurred simultaneously (e.g., worst-case resulting in zero field-current) there is sufficient field-flux, although decaying, to provide torque to drive the prime mover!
Regards, Phil Corso (cepsicon@aol.com)
I would think think a reverse power trip would open the generator breaker and the end result would be a generator rolling to a stop.
From Control Engineering magazine...
Related articles from Control
Engineering magazine- Budget-friendly temperature control unit
- Upgrading control for better polymer performance
- Software pinpoints process interactions
- BP selects SIS for UK deployment
- Here's what you need to know about controls, says Automation Federation, U.S. government
- Electrical product safety: Are testing labs needed or is a supplier's declaration enough?
- Automation vendors boost biofuels
- Cyber security issues take center stage in 2009
- AIC Series presents new high energy storage chokes
- Decrease arc flash risk with new motor control center option
Above articles copyright 2009 Reed Business Information.
Subject to its Terms of Use.
Your use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions set forth under Legal Notices and the Privacy Policy. Please read those terms and conditions carefully. Subject to the rights expressly reserved to others under Legal Notices, the content of this site and the compilation thereof is © 1999-2009 Control Technology Corporation. All rights reserved.
Our Advertisers
Help keep our servers running...
Patronize our advertisers!
Patronize our advertisers!




