Member Login
member
passwd
remember me on
this computer.

- join now -
- forgot username or password? -

Search

Jump to a Date

Sponsored Communities
Cool stuff
Select a topic of interest:
...and press:
Neat Stuff
Control.com Stuff

Visit our shop for nerds in control lifestyle products.

Fortune
Finagle's fourth Law:
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it only makes
it worse.
RSS Feed
RSS feed Use this link to get an RSS feed of the Control.com article flow, for private, non-commercial use only:
www.control.com/rss/
To get a personalized feed, become a member at no cost.
Select a Page Style
Select one of the following styles:
- BluFu
- Classic
(cookies required)
advertisement
from the Automation List department...
Redundant AC800M
Engineering and workplace issues. topic
Posted by Mik on 7 August, 2008 - 12:16 am
Hello to all,

I don't have much experience with ABB's equipment, and I'd like to know more about AC800M controller, especially if it can have redundant CPUs on one controller board. Is that possible?

I want to have a solution that will provide full redundancy, so I need two redundant Ethernet networks with two communication modules.

Should I need also two AC800M controllers in order to have full redundancy?

Thank you very much.


Posted by Jose Castellon on 8 August, 2008 - 1:49 am
Hi Mike,

Yes its possible to have redundant AC800M. You have to ask for model PM861 or PM864 that has this capability through two processors. They also can work in single mode. The AC800M has by itself a redundant ethernet port.

Maybe you can get more information about AC800M through http://www.abb.com or looking for support in the local ABB.

Best Regards,
Jose


Posted by Chris Jennings on 8 August, 2008 - 1:54 am
From what I remember of the AC800M you can have redundancy for both controllers, network, power and I/O. The design is up to you really. The installations I have seen have had redundant networks as a minimum.

Chris Jennings


Posted by Mik on 8 August, 2008 - 9:47 pm
Thank you for your replies.

I'm trying to get as much information (from different sources) as possible. I heard that these controllers are significantly cheaper than S7-400 and can be economically better solution comparing to S7 400H PLCs from Siemens, when redundant solution is preferred. However, it's a little strange to me that actually one controller with two redundant CPU is used. I think two separate PLCs are better solution, because AC800M must have some form of backplane bus in order CPUs and I/Os to communicate, so in case of some kind of fault, both CPUs could go down, which is not exactly 100% solution. Am I right here?


Posted by PVRN on 9 August, 2008 - 1:27 pm
For full redundancy, you will have to go in for two separate controllers.

The problem with these ABB controllers is that the changeover time between the controllers is so long(> 5 seconds)that it defeats the very purpose of redundancy.


Posted by Mik on 10 August, 2008 - 3:51 pm
Hello,
I'm very interested in this. Can you provide more informations, or direct me where I can find it.
Is that time of 5 sec with controller with two CPUs or in general?

I know that there must be some kind of backplane bus which is used for communication between CPUs and I/Os. If that fails, everything fails.
Maybe I should ugo with two separate controllers....


Posted by bng on 12 August, 2008 - 10:52 pm
Hello,

Where are you getting your data from >5sec
I do not think so.


Posted by daniel on 15 August, 2008 - 1:37 am
Hi,

Had some experience with the AC800M series. Very cost competitive. We bought 1 system for process plant in China before where the temperature is below 0 deg C. Had some problem with the fibre optic cables that connect to extended IO carrier where those extended IOs were not able to detect by CPU. At the end, needed to use a hair blower to heat the system... haha... even with heater installed in the PLC panel, this problem still persists.


Posted by PVRN on 14 August, 2008 - 12:56 am
Yes, you should go for 2 separate controllers.

Now, let us take the case that you have these 2 separate controllers and they are working in redundant operation. One controller is active and the other controller is in hot standby mode.If the active controller fails, the standby controller should quickly take over from it. The trouble with ABB controllers is that that the time is more than 5 seconds for this takeover to happen. In the intervening time, the process is badly affected and often the whole plant stops leading to loss of production. Therefore, I suggest that in case you are keen for proper redundancy, look for another system.


Posted by Mik on 15 August, 2008 - 1:48 am
PVRN,

That is very strange to me. Is that from your own experience?

I have found on the following datasheet that switch over time is about 10ms.

Very strange indeed.

Do you know any official data you can direct me to, so I can use this as an argument why not to use this controller?


Posted by Rob on 23 September, 2008 - 1:32 am
PVRN,

Sorry, I hate saying that someone is wrong, but the general statement that all ABB AC800M redundant controllers take 5 seconds to switch over to backup is simply not true.

If you have experienced a problem where your controller is stopped for 5 seconds during a fail over, then you have a serious issue that should be addressed by ABB support line.

http://www[.]lymac.co.nz


Posted by PVRN on 14 October, 2008 - 1:32 pm
Sorry, but I also hate to say that truth is bitter. AC800M has major problems with redundancy. It does not work properly.

Talking about ABB's support service, it is very bad. ABB takes very long to respond and charges high amounts for service.


Posted by Gryskop on 16 October, 2008 - 11:28 am
Sorry, but I also hate to say that truth is bitter. AC800M has major problems with redundancy. It does not work properly.
Talking about ABB's support service, it is very bad. ABB takes very long to respond and charges high amounts for service.

As for the redundancy changeover, I too find that very hard to believe. There must be something wrong with either the hardware installation or software setup. ABB DCS and PLC systems are generally very fast in changeover. So much so that the SCADA does not even know a changeover took place


Posted by Mik on 16 October, 2008 - 3:23 pm
PVRN, please can you describe me your solution? I want to make sure same thing cannot happen to me.
If you can, please send at mik_alvis at yahoo.com

Thanks

From Control Engineering magazine...
Related articles from Control Engineering magazine
Above articles copyright 2009 Reed Business Information. Subject to its Terms of Use.
Your use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions set forth under Legal Notices and the Privacy Policy. Please read those terms and conditions carefully. Subject to the rights expressly reserved to others under Legal Notices, the content of this site and the compilation thereof is © 1999-2009 Control Technology Corporation. All rights reserved.

Users of this site are benefiting from open source technologies, including PHP, MySQL and Apache. Be happy.

Internet Explorer 6.0 Fix

Advertisement
Our Advertisers
Help keep our servers running...
Patronize our advertisers!