
Visit our shop for nerds in control lifestyle products.
- PC reliability?
- Windows, real time
- PID loops
- PCs vs. PLCs
- Replacing people
- MS 'monopoly'?
- Software quality
- Where do we go from here?
- Why pay?
program doesn't deliver it.
www.control.com/rss/
To get a personalized feed, become a member at no cost.
I don't have much experience with ABB's equipment, and I'd like to know more about AC800M controller, especially if it can have redundant CPUs on one controller board. Is that possible?
I want to have a solution that will provide full redundancy, so I need two redundant Ethernet networks with two communication modules.
Should I need also two AC800M controllers in order to have full redundancy?
Thank you very much.
Yes its possible to have redundant AC800M. You have to ask for model PM861 or PM864 that has this capability through two processors. They also can work in single mode. The AC800M has by itself a redundant ethernet port.
Maybe you can get more information about AC800M through http://www.abb.com or looking for support in the local ABB.
Best Regards,
Jose
Chris Jennings
I'm trying to get as much information (from different sources) as possible. I heard that these controllers are significantly cheaper than S7-400 and can be economically better solution comparing to S7 400H PLCs from Siemens, when redundant solution is preferred. However, it's a little strange to me that actually one controller with two redundant CPU is used. I think two separate PLCs are better solution, because AC800M must have some form of backplane bus in order CPUs and I/Os to communicate, so in case of some kind of fault, both CPUs could go down, which is not exactly 100% solution. Am I right here?
The problem with these ABB controllers is that the changeover time between the controllers is so long(> 5 seconds)that it defeats the very purpose of redundancy.
I'm very interested in this. Can you provide more informations, or direct me where I can find it.
Is that time of 5 sec with controller with two CPUs or in general?
I know that there must be some kind of backplane bus which is used for communication between CPUs and I/Os. If that fails, everything fails.
Maybe I should ugo with two separate controllers....
Had some experience with the AC800M series. Very cost competitive. We bought 1 system for process plant in China before where the temperature is below 0 deg C. Had some problem with the fibre optic cables that connect to extended IO carrier where those extended IOs were not able to detect by CPU. At the end, needed to use a hair blower to heat the system... haha... even with heater installed in the PLC panel, this problem still persists.
Now, let us take the case that you have these 2 separate controllers and they are working in redundant operation. One controller is active and the other controller is in hot standby mode.If the active controller fails, the standby controller should quickly take over from it. The trouble with ABB controllers is that that the time is more than 5 seconds for this takeover to happen. In the intervening time, the process is badly affected and often the whole plant stops leading to loss of production. Therefore, I suggest that in case you are keen for proper redundancy, look for another system.
That is very strange to me. Is that from your own experience?
I have found on the following datasheet that switch over time is about 10ms.
Very strange indeed.
Do you know any official data you can direct me to, so I can use this as an argument why not to use this controller?
Sorry, I hate saying that someone is wrong, but the general statement that all ABB AC800M redundant controllers take 5 seconds to switch over to backup is simply not true.
If you have experienced a problem where your controller is stopped for 5 seconds during a fail over, then you have a serious issue that should be addressed by ABB support line.
http://www[.]lymac.co.nz
Talking about ABB's support service, it is very bad. ABB takes very long to respond and charges high amounts for service.
Talking about ABB's support service, it is very bad. ABB takes very long to respond and charges high amounts for service.
As for the redundancy changeover, I too find that very hard to believe. There must be something wrong with either the hardware installation or software setup. ABB DCS and PLC systems are generally very fast in changeover. So much so that the SCADA does not even know a changeover took place
If you can, please send at mik_alvis at yahoo.com
Thanks
- ABCs of SBCs: Single board computers for embedded control; Lego learning
- Less, more: NEMA cites less confidence; NAM sees more exports of manufactured goods
- Free webinar on Zigbee for embedded systems
- Better together? Ametek, Dresser-Rand, IntervalZero, Rexroth make acquisitions
- You need 2 monitors: This Website will prove it
- Preview: Mitsubishi iQ controls sequence, motion, process, CNC, robotics; has connectivity
- 30 new Rockwell Automation products integrate hardware, software
- Digital manufacturing: Autodesk Inventor shows component interactions
- Software certified by AT&T: Runs on PDAs, cellphones, enables mobile applications
- Research: HMI supervisory software use increases with service needs
Patronize our advertisers!




