Member Login
member
passwd
remember me on
this computer.

- join now -
- forgot username or password? -

Search

Jump to a Date

Sponsored Communities
Cool stuff
Select a topic of interest:
...and press:
Neat Stuff
Control.com Stuff

Visit our shop for nerds in control lifestyle products.

Fortune
Q: How many IBM cpu's does it take to do a logical right shift?
A: 33. 1 to hold the bits and 32 to push the register.
RSS Feed
RSS feed Use this link to get an RSS feed of the Control.com article flow, for private, non-commercial use only:
www.control.com/rss/
To get a personalized feed, become a member at no cost.
Select a Page Style
Select one of the following styles:
- BluFu
- Classic
(cookies required)
advertisement
from the Swimming in Mud department...
Mud Level inside a Thickener
Application Questions and Problems topic
Posted by Thys on 9 August, 2008 - 1:29 pm
I'm looking for an Instrument of some sort that can show me the Mud Level inside a Thickener. I 'm using a Turbidity Transmitter to give me the clarity of the water but I need more. I'm in the Gold Mining Industry


Posted by Roy Matson on 10 August, 2008 - 3:42 pm
I worked in mining for a lot of years, most of the thickeners had a float device. A SS ball about 6" diameter sliding on a length of SS tube. A magnet inside the float activated a series of reed switches inside the tube. I think it was in about 5% steps.

The ball is filled with sand or water until it just sinks in water (floats on mud).
If you put a flange mounted transmitter on the bottom cone zeroed on water it will tell you the percentage of mud to water but not the actual level This can be quite useful.

I have also been told (haven't tried it) that a regular ultrasonic transmitter dipped in the water will work. The speed of sound is much higher in water than air.

Hope this helps
Roy


Posted by wboyes on 10 August, 2008 - 8:26 pm
I've used the ultrasonic thingys, from several different manufacturers, and they seem to work okay until there's an upset, or the rag layer rises. The big problem with the ultrasonics (and I think somebody makes one that is optical, or infrared) is that they have to be picked up when the traveling bridge of the clarifier goes around. This is a mechanical device kludge, and
is prone to failure.

I've also used a Sludge Judge(tm) which is a long clear plastic pipe with a cap and a release on one end. This is "calibrated" by having rule lines painted on it. You can buy them or you can make them.

Walt Boyes
Editor in Chief
Control and Controlglobal.com
www.controlglobal.com
Mailto:wboyes@putman.net
Read my blog SoundOFF!! At www.controlglobal.com/soundoff


Posted by Roy Matson on 12 August, 2008 - 2:30 am
Walt,

I share your lack of faith in ultrasonics especially if the interface layer is not well defined.

I searched the web without success trying to find the float type I described, they were very reliable but would not of course measure below the upper rake level. I came across a device from Endress&Hauser that winches down a displacer between rake passings. This is an idea I have seen built on site from time to time.

I am not convinced that bed level is that important provided the overflow is clear. I have had some success in getting operators to use the DP cell as a measure of total mud along with underflow density and flocculent ratioed to feed rate.

Roy


Posted by Kaz on 21 August, 2008 - 12:56 am
Mate,

Would you know who makes the SS ball devices to accurately measure mud levels?

Rgds,
Kaz


Posted by Roy Matson on 22 August, 2008 - 2:13 am
Kaz,

Yay, I finally found it!
http://apitechs.net/pitProbe.aspx#gemProbeSensor

This shows a picture of one for oilfield application.

http://www.gemssensors.com/Content.aspx?id=2842

Shows you the 8" SS ball float.

I'm not sure if Gems know that it's used for interface. I suspect the thickener manufacturers just modified the ball by adding a 1/8" NPT plug. Just add water until it sinks.

Good Luck,
Roy


Posted by Roy Matson on 23 August, 2008 - 7:22 pm
Kaz,
Drop me an e-mail and I will send some thoughts on thickener roy_matson @ yahoo.ca

Roy


Posted by Anonymous on 15 September, 2008 - 11:44 pm
You could try the SmartDiver.

From Control Engineering magazine...
Related articles from Control Engineering magazine
Above articles copyright 2009 Reed Business Information. Subject to its Terms of Use.
Your use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions set forth under Legal Notices and the Privacy Policy. Please read those terms and conditions carefully. Subject to the rights expressly reserved to others under Legal Notices, the content of this site and the compilation thereof is © 1999-2009 Control Technology Corporation. All rights reserved.

Users of this site are benefiting from open source technologies, including PHP, MySQL and Apache. Be happy.

Internet Explorer 6.0 Fix

Advertisement
Our Advertisers
Help keep our servers running...
Patronize our advertisers!