Control.com - Nerds in Control
from the Forum department...
Bit resolution on ADC
  | Posted by automatix  on 3 October, 2008 - 5:28 am |
Dear friends,
Does anyone know the importance of bit resolution on a AD/DA converter?
If I change a 16 bit resolution ADC module with 8 bit resolution, would the analog data be accurately read by the PLC?
We need to know this because we are afraid it will lead to an inaccurate data reading, which is something that must be avoided in the gas industry.
I really appreciate your willingness to share knowledge or experience.
Thank you and best regards.
Automate. ix at gmail. com
Does anyone know the importance of bit resolution on a AD/DA converter?
If I change a 16 bit resolution ADC module with 8 bit resolution, would the analog data be accurately read by the PLC?
We need to know this because we are afraid it will lead to an inaccurate data reading, which is something that must be avoided in the gas industry.
I really appreciate your willingness to share knowledge or experience.
Thank you and best regards.
Automate. ix at gmail. com
|
Well, first you have to understand the difference between "accuracy" and "resolution".
An 8 bit A/D converter may be perfectly accurate. However, it has lower resolution so will not be able to resolve small differences in measurement.
The output of an 8 bit A/D converter has 256 possible values (2^8). For an input of 0-100 % to the A/D converter the output resolution is better than 0.4% (actually its 100/256) and is perfectly good for most level measurement applications.
However, in a 0-10,000 l/min flow range that's a possible error of between 0 l/min to 39 l/min. You need to decide if this is an error you can live with or not. Of course, there will be other errors from things like sensor noise, calibration erors, over & under range etc so in practice your actual error may be slightly higher than this value.
The same is true for an Analogue output.
Rob
www[.]lymac.co.nz
An 8 bit A/D converter may be perfectly accurate. However, it has lower resolution so will not be able to resolve small differences in measurement.
The output of an 8 bit A/D converter has 256 possible values (2^8). For an input of 0-100 % to the A/D converter the output resolution is better than 0.4% (actually its 100/256) and is perfectly good for most level measurement applications.
However, in a 0-10,000 l/min flow range that's a possible error of between 0 l/min to 39 l/min. You need to decide if this is an error you can live with or not. Of course, there will be other errors from things like sensor noise, calibration erors, over & under range etc so in practice your actual error may be slightly higher than this value.
The same is true for an Analogue output.
Rob
www[.]lymac.co.nz
| Posted by automatix on 4 October, 2008 - 9:48 pm |
Dear Mr Rob,
i have read your brief explanation about AD/DA converter resolution.
it has also made me clear that i should not change the existing 16 bit ADC into the 8 ones. since our system can only tolerate a very small deviation.
Thank you for your help Mr.Rob
i have read your brief explanation about AD/DA converter resolution.
it has also made me clear that i should not change the existing 16 bit ADC into the 8 ones. since our system can only tolerate a very small deviation.
Thank you for your help Mr.Rob
Your use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions set forth under Legal Notices and the Privacy Policy. Please read those terms and conditions carefully. Subject to the rights expressly reserved to others under Legal Notices, the content of this site and the compilation thereof is © 1999-2013 Nerds in Control, LLC. All rights reserved.
Users of this site are benefiting from open source technologies, including PHP, MySQL and Apache. Be happy.
Fortune
"I used to think that the brain was the most wonderful organ in my
body. Then I realized who was telling me this."
-- Emo Phillips
