We are doing a project for a chemical plant. In this plant STAHL remote IO is used. There are 50 Romote IO cabinets. We want to get a solution so that Profibus NW can be used in ring topolgy (in a redundant way). The distance from the host of this remote IO is approx 300 m.
You can get a redundant profibus link using a ring topology by using fiber optic converters and a fiber backbone for the profibus network. The fiber modems automatically detect a break or fault in the fiber ring and send the data "round the other way" (for want of a better explanation). In fact, if your profibus is 300m long I would expect this to be much easier setup to install and troubleshoot than a copper based network.
Phoenix Contact amongst others make suitable modems.
www[.]lymac.co.nz
Phoenix Contact amongst others make suitable modems.
www[.]lymac.co.nz
Hello Partha;
Here is a FAQ from Siemens explaining their solution for Profibus-DP redundant ring topology:
http://support.automation.siemens.com/WW/view/en/19758281
If more information is required, click o the New Search link on the same page, and do a search on any product number you require.
Hoep this helps,
Daniel Chartier
Here is a FAQ from Siemens explaining their solution for Profibus-DP redundant ring topology:
http://support.automation.siemens.com/WW/view/en/19758281
If more information is required, click o the New Search link on the same page, and do a search on any product number you require.
Hoep this helps,
Daniel Chartier
Ring topology using CONVERTERS is not quite redundancy.
The converter is not redundant. So the converter itself is a single point of failure.
The devices (PLC, remote-I/O, drive...) only have a single communication port so it is also a single point of failure.
The wire between the converter and the device is single (albeit short) and is a single point of failure.
In a truly redundant system each device has two communication ports, so if one port fails the other port can still be used. "Splitting T" is not required.
Cheers,
Jonas
The converter is not redundant. So the converter itself is a single point of failure.
The devices (PLC, remote-I/O, drive...) only have a single communication port so it is also a single point of failure.
The wire between the converter and the device is single (albeit short) and is a single point of failure.
In a truly redundant system each device has two communication ports, so if one port fails the other port can still be used. "Splitting T" is not required.
Cheers,
Jonas
Your use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions set forth under Legal Notices and the Privacy Policy. Please read those terms and conditions carefully. Subject to the rights expressly reserved to others under Legal Notices, the content of this site and the compilation thereof is © 1999-2010 Nerds in Control, LLC. All rights reserved.
Users of this site are benefiting from open source technologies, including PHP, MySQL and Apache. Be happy.
Fortune
I predict that today will be remembered until tomorrow!







