Member Login
member
passwd
remember me on
this computer.

- join now -
- forgot username or password? -

Search

Jump to a Date

Sponsored Communities
Cool stuff
Select a topic of interest:
...and press:
Neat Stuff
Control.com Stuff

Visit our shop for nerds in control lifestyle products.

Fortune
Texas law forbids anyone to have a pair of pliers in his possession.
RSS Feed
RSS feed Use this link to get an RSS feed of the Control.com article flow, for private, non-commercial use only:
www.control.com/rss/
To get a personalized feed, become a member at no cost.
Select a Page Style
Select one of the following styles:
- BluFu
- Classic
(cookies required)
advertisement
from the Forum department...
Circuit Breaker Duty
Engineering and workplace issues. topic
Posted by R.Shaikh on 6 November, 2008 - 6:44 am
I read very informative stuff (dated Sept 07) regarding Make and Break Duty of breakers. I would appreciate if someone can clarify why single phase make duty is greater than three phase duty, and is this always the case? Is that due to maximum asymmetry during single phase fault?? Thanks.


Posted by Phil Corso on 6 November, 2008 - 10:43 pm
Responding to Shaikh's 06-Nov-08 (06:11) query... there are two types of electrical faults; symmetrical and unsymmetrical. Solution of the former is simple because it is a balanced 3-ph system that can be represented as a single-phase series circuit.

A solution of the latter is not as simple because it is unbalanced. Thus, a mathematical technique called Symmetrical Components is used. For more detail refer to Control List Topic:

http://control.com/thread/1026222892

How, then, does the above relate to your question?

Any unsymmetrical-fault can be represented by 3 "balanced" sets of impedances: the first is referred to as the positive-sequence impedance, Z1; the second, the negative-sequence impedance, Z2; and the third, the zero-sequence impedance, Zo.

For the three-phase short circuit, current is determined by the formula:

I(3) = Epn/Z1, where Epn is the phase-to-neutral voltage.

For the phase-to-ground fault, current is:

I(1) = (3xEpn)/(Z1+Z2+Zo).

It is obvious if the 3 impedances were equal, then the phase-to-ground fault current would equal the 3-phase case. However, with some electrical equipment, (e.g. a generator) the positive and negative sequence impedances are equal, but the zero-sequence impedance is smaller. Thus, the phase-to-ground fault current is larger than that of the 3-phase case.

If you require additional info, let me know.

Regards, Phil Corso (cepsicon@aol.com)


Posted by R.Shaikh on 7 November, 2008 - 6:28 am
Thanks Phil. I was thinking on the lines that when fault occurs at maximum current (zero voltage), initial current is zero due to equal and opposite DC offset. Current reaches its maximum (negative) value after half a cycle and that specifies Make Duty. If this argument is valid for both single and three phase faults and based on what you said that due to smaller ZPS impedance, single phase fault current can be higher than 3 phase one, is this the reason we see higher single phase duty?

Regards


Posted by Phil Corso on 7 November, 2008 - 9:10 am
Adding to my 06-Nov-08 (22:43) response:

1) Phase-to-ground fault-current is not always greater than the 3-phase case.

2) Fault-current asymmetry has more to do with the L/R ratio of the total fault path impedance between the source and the point of fault. This affects closing or making duty.

3) Z1 and Z2 are not always equal.

FYI, the formula for a phase-to-phase, fault-current formula is

I(2)= (sqrt(3)xEpn)/(Z1+Z2)

If a neutral impedance (e.g. NGR, or NGT), Zn, is involved, then the fault-current formula is

I(1)= 3xEpn/(Z1+Z2+Zo+3xZn)

Regards, Phil Corso (cepsicon@aol.com)

From Control Engineering magazine...
Related articles from Control Engineering magazine
Above articles copyright 2009 Reed Business Information. Subject to its Terms of Use.
Your use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions set forth under Legal Notices and the Privacy Policy. Please read those terms and conditions carefully. Subject to the rights expressly reserved to others under Legal Notices, the content of this site and the compilation thereof is © 1999-2009 Control Technology Corporation. All rights reserved.

Users of this site are benefiting from open source technologies, including PHP, MySQL and Apache. Be happy.

Internet Explorer 6.0 Fix

Advertisement
Our Advertisers
Help keep our servers running...
Patronize our advertisers!