
Visit our shop for nerds in control lifestyle products.
- PC reliability?
- Windows, real time
- PID loops
- PCs vs. PLCs
- Replacing people
- MS 'monopoly'?
- Software quality
- Where do we go from here?
- Why pay?
ego.
www.control.com/rss/
To get a personalized feed, become a member at no cost.
OPC is not a good way to control devices. If the application is slow enough, say on the order of one scan per second, it's okay. If you need anything even remotely resembling performance, say 100ms or better, forget OPC.
It's possible to write it yourself, but it is not for the faint of heart. The EtherNet/IP spec is quite complicated, and will require time measured in man-months.
Hilscher has a nifty and reasonably inexpensive solution using an add-in card (PCI or PCI Express), but I'm not sure if they have the EtherNet/IP scanner functionality yet.
-James Ingraham
Sage Automation, Inc.
http://freshmeat.net/projects/tuxeip/
and have integrated it into
http://pvbrowser.org
It allows at least some simple communication with EIP adapters.
Heinz
- Emerson expands capabilities of asset management suite
- Commentary: Wireless for process moves beyond instrumentation
- Motorola wireless mobility: More integration, automation efficiencies, sensors
- Microchip wireless: embedded Wi-Fi, ZigBee, ISM band
- Honeywell extends wireless platform with discrete input transmitters
- Quatech wireless Ethernet bridge, in external device or embedded
- Technology update: Alternative power sources for instrumentation
- Honeywell Process Solutions: 34th Americas User Group, 6 areas of change in next 10 years
- Sensors Expo photo gallery: Olympic torch, power harvesting, wireless demo
- Wireless sensors resolve industrial, economic, societal challenges, says Honeywell
Patronize our advertisers!




