advertisement
from the Forum department...
Standard Scan Time
PLCs and related questions. topic
Posted by Vendetta on 3 December, 2008 - 2:25 am
I have some concern of controller scan time. Scan time can be varied depend on the application, numbers of IO, data and etc. But do we actually have a standard limit for it (IEC, DIN, etc.) that are acceptably used by industries (oil & gas, manufacturing, etc.). Like SHELL, they stated that they would accept around 350ms.


Posted by Rob on 3 December, 2008 - 11:25 pm
There is no such thing as a standard scan time for the very good reason that there is no such thing as a standard process.

The *required* scan time of your application depends on how fast it reacts. For example, as a rule of thumb your PID loop should execute at least 2 * faster than the open loop time constant of the loop and preferably much quicker.

This means PID loops in many typical industrial processes can have a scan time of 0.5 or 1 second. However a 1 second scan time for motion control is typically far too slow - equipment moving at 2 meters per sec moves a long way in one scan.

The reality is that a blanket statement like "the scan interval should be 350ms for any and all applications" is lazy engineering and likely to get you into a lot of trouble.

Scan time is dependent upon your specific process or application requirements and the capabilities of your controller.

Rob
www[.]lymac.co.nz


Posted by Vendetta on 4 December, 2008 - 2:31 am
It is agreed then... End-users like Shell have their own Technical Standard. I believe that there are some reasons why they state the number (350ms). They should have performed a study on their processes requirement, sensor and actuator response, safety time, SIL, etc.


Posted by Abhijit Goswami, Haldia on 5 December, 2008 - 5:55 am
Dear Vendetta,

When we talk about shell standard, it generally applies for refinery/petrochemicals. In these applications, process response is not exceptionally fast other than turbine/compressor control applications or areas where run away reactions are possible. Normally "process response time" and "process safety time" identified by licensors in PDP/BEP decides scan time requirement of control/shutdown systems in these applications. However, scan time is only a part of overall loop response time which additionally involve response time of sensors/panel components like barriers, etc./final actuation device.

For a normal petrochemical process 250 ms scan time for a shutdown system is quite acceptable.

For turbine/compressor control applications, scan time of the system are generally better than 50 msec.

Regards.


Posted by yantsi on 4 December, 2008 - 8:12 pm
I think there is no standard for this. In my experience with one system all of the modules use the same scan rate 1 sec. And with another system all of the hardwired points are 2 sec and software points from a 3rd party system are 5 sec. Normally it depends on your CPU and your requirement. I think so.


Posted by Shahid Waqas on 6 December, 2008 - 4:24 am
Agree with Mr. Goswami.
However, on a side note, there is a lot of discussion by many vendors on what is a "scan" time?

My definition of a scan time is simple:

TIMEinput + TIMElogic+TIMEoutput = SCAN

Best regards,
Shahid


Posted by Bob Peterson on 6 December, 2008 - 7:36 am
I have never run across any plc that had a scan time of 350 msec. The longest scan I have ever seen was just under 100 msec. You would have to really load a modern plc to get anything like that long of a scan time.


Posted by Bud Buyer on 7 December, 2008 - 2:04 pm
Bob,
Honeywell's HC900 hybrid controller has a fixed 500mS scan time for the analogs, something less than 30mS for DI/DO's. But they don't claim it's a PLC, either, it's a hybrid.

It works great for the thermal and level processes we run when 2 pts/sec is more than adequate.

Bud

Your use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions set forth under Legal Notices and the Privacy Policy. Please read those terms and conditions carefully. Subject to the rights expressly reserved to others under Legal Notices, the content of this site and the compilation thereof is © 1999-2010 Nerds in Control, LLC. All rights reserved.

Users of this site are benefiting from open source technologies, including PHP, MySQL and Apache. Be happy.


Fortune
VMS is like a nightmare about RXS-11M.
Advertise here
Advertisement
our advertisers
Help keep our servers running...
Patronize our advertisers!
Visit our Post Archive