advertisement
from the Forum department...
PX_VIB_GAIN in Mark V
Power generation equipment control. topic
Posted by anonymous on 12 May, 2009 - 12:16 am
Dear all,

how is the PX_VIB_GAIN been set in Mark V for vibration calculation, we always having problem vibration reading is different between Bently & Mark V because of this setting is varies between 1.014 to 1.446


Posted by CSA on 13 May, 2009 - 1:29 am
I've searched several heavy duty gas turbine jobs I have and on LM application, and I can't find this signal name.

Can you please be more specific about the application (gas or steam; heavy duty or aero; etc.) and what the signal does? Is it in I/O Configuration or a Control Constant in the CSP?

I'm going to guess it has something to do with a proximitor vibration pick-up gain. But that's just a guess.


Posted by anonymous on 13 May, 2009 - 10:13 am
Dear Sir,
ours is 500MW Syeam Turbine,

it's under DIAGC Data Display TCQB#B Diagnostics
proximeters 1-18 Vibration inputs
i.e

FPKD FVIB_PTP FVIB_GAIN PX_VIB_GAIN PX_VIB
PX1 = -10 241 1.036 1.453 -0.1

but this is value during off bar I try to get other value during unit running

FPKD is the input signal from Bently and PX_VIB is the end value that reads by Mark V for as BB1X. I observed during low load i.e from sync to 300MW the value PX_VIB_GAIN varies between 1.01 to 1.45 until it settle to 1.01 and you can see the Bently reading is different with Mark V value

thanks in advance


Posted by CSA on 14 May, 2009 - 2:07 am
It's been said before on control.com: The data from DIAGC is suspect since there are a very limited number of people who can say for certain that DIAGC.DAT is exactly correct for the versions of cards and PROMs installed in the panel. It was very common for DIAGC.DAT not to be properly updated if PROMs were ever changed/upgraded in the field. It was also common for incorrect DIAGC.DAT files to be shipped to site with the original software and never correctly updated.

Having said that, I'm not familiar with the signal you are asking about. Since proximitor feedback is a function of speed I wonder if that number is something that is being calculated based on speed changes (which might be very small but perceptible during load changes). How steady is the frequency of the grid to which you are connected?

Have you plotted (using VIEW2) turbine speed and load and the proximitor inputs during loading and unloading?

I have seen a lot of differences between readings on a B-N monitor/rack and those on Speedtronic turbine control panels. Sometimes that can be attributed to PROM versions and sometimes it can be attributed to configuration settings, but in my experience it's very difficult to get the indications of the two systems to agree--even when they are using the same proximitor inputs!

Sometimes the differences are small and "negligible"; sometimes they are very large and almost disturbing. But, differences are not uncommon.

Is this difference you are experiencing only on one proximitor input, or just the largest on this particular input, or do all the proximitor inputs have about the same difference?

I hope someone else here on control.com has seen this problem and can provide some help. My experience has been that the differences were only narrowed with PROM changes. And a lot of time and energy was expended in trying to get to the cause of the differences; a lot of data was taken using an ADRE system over a couple of weeks.


Posted by anonymous on 14 May, 2009 - 10:35 pm
CSA, thanks for the feedback, I will plot the graph and analyze the trend. I just need to know how they set that gain, what is the input, calculation or F(x) if any. GE did mention in Mark V checkout procedure for vibration probe that we need to match the mark V and wobulator (KE3) speed when do the probe calibration if not there is error between but no further information given.

I already call GE TA in but he also not very sure about that setting. I also call Bently MDS engineer to setup the ADRE cause right now, its fluctuate between 0.19 to 0.21mm our alarm is set at 0.2mm and trip at o.25mm and as I mention earlier BN local reading is only 0.14 to 0.16mm. All the vib reading have error but right know bearing 4 is highest.

thanks again


Posted by Paul on 15 May, 2009 - 3:52 pm
Hi,

just a quick post and I'll check when back in the ofice on Monday, but there is the possibility to install bandpass filters on the BN and sensonics systems. It is quite feasible that the filters are set at different frequencies and with different rolls off's so as to create a different indication.

Your use of this site is subject to the terms and conditions set forth under Legal Notices and the Privacy Policy. Please read those terms and conditions carefully. Subject to the rights expressly reserved to others under Legal Notices, the content of this site and the compilation thereof is © 1999-2010 Nerds in Control, LLC. All rights reserved.

Users of this site are benefiting from open source technologies, including PHP, MySQL and Apache. Be happy.


Fortune
Ray's Rule of Precision:
Measure with a micrometer. Mark with chalk. Cut with an axe.
Advertise here
Advertisement
our advertisers
Help keep our servers running...
Patronize our advertisers!
Visit our Post Archive